Eigenfunction vs wave function

Flavia
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
What is the difference between eigenfunction and wave function?

I'm always get confused when i am asked to write wave function and eigenfunction..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
An eigenfunction is a type of wavefunction that has an eigenvalue when operated on. It is said to be "an eigenfunction of the operator".
 
Simon Bridge said:
An eigenfunction is a type of wavefunction that has an eigenvalue when operated on. It is said to be "an eigenfunction of the operator".

is this right?

ψ(x,t) = ψ1(x) + ψ2(x)
wavefunction = eigenfunction1 + eigenfunction2
 
Flavia said:
is this right?

ψ(x,t) = ψ1(x) + ψ2(x)
wavefunction = eigenfunction1 + eigenfunction2

Assuming ψ1,ψ2 are eigenfunctions, then yes... Just because the wavefunction is written as the sum of something doesn't mean those somethings are eigenfunctions!

Here's the full description of the situation: You have a quantum system which has only two possible states, 1 and 2. That means there are two quantum states, ψ1 and ψ2 describing the system in either state 1 or 2 (1 and 2 can be spin up or spin down, for example). In general, then, any arbitrary wavefunction can be written as a linear superposition of these two states, \Psi(x,t) = \alpha \Psi_1(x,t) + \beta \Psi_2(x,t). This is possible because the set of eigenstates (ψ1,ψ2) are complete and form a basis.
 
Since the LHS is a function of time as well as position while the LHS is position only, not really. However ... let's say we have a set of wavefunctions \{ \psi_n \} which has been selected so that \mathbf{H}\psi_n = E_n\psi_n ... then each \psi_n is said to be an eigenfunction of the Hamiltonian with eigenvalue E_n.

A system prepared in a superpostion state may have wavefunction \psi = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left ( \psi_1 + \psi_2\right ) (assuming each \psi_n are already normalized.) In this case \psi is not an eigenfunction of the Hamiltonian.

In general, the set of eigenfunctions of an operator can be used as a basis set. Any wavefunction can. Therefore, be represented in terms of a superposition of eigenfunctions ... including eigenfunctions of another operator. (Just in case someone infers that superpositions of eigenfunctions cannot be eigenfunctions.) It is also possible for a wavefunction to, simultaniously, be an eigenfunction of more than one operator.

Notice how careful I was in the way I phrased things above?
In QM it is very important to be careful about what exactly is being said about a system ... when you are starting out it is as well to get really pedantic about this.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top