Eigenfunctions and Energy Measurements in Quantum Mechanics

[t1mbro]

Ok so I am revising for an exam that's in a day or so and I'm totally stuck on some revison questions, needless to say i need to understand what's going on not just get an answer so if somone can help me do this I would be grateful. Should be pretty easy it's basic stuff from last yr but my mind is going at about 1000miles an hour and i can't think straight.

Hamiltonian operator for particular system has energy eigenvalues En (n = 1,2,3) and corresponding normalized eigenfunctions Un. the eigenfuntions corresponding to different eigenvalues are orthogonal. The wavefuntion of the electron is given by.

Si = K(3U1 +4U2)

(a)calc real normalisation const, k
(b)what is probablity P1 that measurement of energy would give E1?
(c)................E2?
(d)................E3?
(e)Using p1 and P2 determine the average value for energy of the electron.
(f)Evaluate expectation vaule of hamiltionian operator for an electron in state Si and show that this is the answer obtained in (e)

numerical answers:
a) 1/5
b)9/25
c)16/25
d)0
e) (9E1+16E2)/25

I'm supposed to use what in our lectures were postlates 4 and 6.

4. something about si (x,t) = SUM (j) cj SIj (x) exp(-iEjt/hbar)

where Ej is energy associated with SIj

mmm can't write rest as with limited keyboard.

and postulate 6.

Pl = |al|^2/ SUM |an|^2 where SI = SUM (n) an SIn

Sorry I realize the type is confusing will clarify anything needed, thanks for help

 

[HallsofIvy]

You vector is k(3U₁+ 4U₂). Assuming that these eigenvectors are orthonormal as well as orthogonal (that is, they are taken to be unit vectors), then 3U₁+ 4U₂ has length
\sqrt{3^2+ 4^2}= \sqrt{25}= 5
In order to make k(3U₁+ 4U₂) a unit vector, k must equal 1/5.

In that case k(3U₁+ 4U₂)= 1/5(3U₁+ 4U₂)= (3/5)U₁+ (4/5)U₂+ (0/5)U₃. The "amplitudes" for U₁, U₂, U₃ are 3/5, 4/5, and 0 respectively. Their probabilities are the squares of those: 9/25, 16/25, and 0.

 

[t1mbro]

ok, what you said makes sense, except, why is it a vector? am i being utterly stupid?

 

[Edgardo]

(a) In general a wavefunction (stationary state) looks like this:
\Psi = K( c_{1} u_{1} + c_{2} u_{2} + c_{3} u_{3} + ...)
where K is the normalization constant.

The numbers c_{1},c_{2},c_{3},c_{4}... are the coefficients.

You can calculate K by K=\sqrt{|c_{1}|^2+|c_{2}|^2+|c_{3}|^2 +...},
so what you do is you take the absolute square of each coefficient, sum them up and take the squareroot of this sum =>
that's K

Your wavefunction is:
\Psi = K(3 u_{1} + 4 u_{2})
\Psi = K(c_{1} u_{1} + c_{2} u_{2})

Your coefficients are c_{1}=3[/itex] and c_{2}=4.<br /> Plugging this into the formula for K you get:<br /> K= \sqrt{|3|^2+|4|^2} = \sqrt{25} = 5<br /> <br /> Thus your wavefunction is:<br /> \Psi = \frac{1}{5}(3 u_{1} + 4 u_{2})<br /> = \frac{3}{5} u_{1} + \frac{4}{5} u_{2}<br /> <br /> Now you have the new, normalized coefficients:<br /> \Psi = b_{1} u_{1} + b_{2} u_{2}<br /> = \frac{3}{5} u_{1} + \frac{4}{5} u_{2}<br /> <br /> The new normalized coefficients are:<br /> b_{1} = \frac{3}{5}<br /> b_{2} = \frac{4}{5}<br /> <br /> <br /> <b>(b)</b> You can get p_{1}by the formula p_{1} = |b_{1}|^2,<br /> that is you just have to pick out the &quot;normalized&quot; coeficient b_{1}<br /> in front of the eigenfunction u_{1} and take the absolute square of it. <br /> Look above, the coefficient in front of <br /> u_{1} is b_{1}= \frac{3}{5}. Thus, using the formula p_{1} = |b_{1}|^2 you obtain 9/25. <br /> I repeat: Use the normalized coefficient! (not the c_{1})<br /> <br /> <br /> <b>(c)</b> You do the same as in (b), pick out the coefficient in front of u_{2}, which <br /> is b_{1} = \frac{4}{5} (see above). You obviously get p_{2} = \frac{9}{25}<br /> <br /> <br /> <b>(d)</b> Just take again the formula p_{3} = |c_{3}|^2.<br /> But then the question is where do you get |c_{3}|^2 from? It&#039;s the coefficient in front of u_{3}, but since u_{3} doesn&#039;t appear in the wavefunction \Psi = \frac{3}{5} u_{1} + \frac{4}{5} u_{2}, the coefficient is zero. <br /> <br /> To better understand this you could also write:<br /> \Psi = \frac{3}{5} u_{1} + \fract{4}{5} u_{2}<br /> = \frac{3}{5} u_{1} + \fract{4}{5} u_{2} + 0 u_{3}, right? (I just added a zero there)<br /> Then you see the coefficient is zero in front of u_{3}.<br /> <br /> <br /> <b>(e)</b> The average energy is defined as: <br /> Expectation value for energy = \sum_{i} p_{i} E_{i}<br /> (just as you know it from school).<br /> <br /> Just plug in the values you obtained before:<br /> Expectation value for energy = \frac{9}{25} E_{1} + \frac{16}{25} E_{2} = \frac{1}{25} \left (9E_{1} + 16E_{2} \right )<br /> <br /> <b>(f)</b> The expectation value is defined as \langle \hat{H} \rangle = \langle \Psi| \hat{H} | \Psi \rangle.<br /> (i) First calculate \hat{H} | \Psi \rangle, <br /> (ii) then &quot;multiply&quot; from the left side \langle \Psi |.<br /> <br /> Hint for (i): \hat{H} |u_{1}\rangle = E_{1} |u_{1} \rangle, <br /> and \hat{H} |u_{2}\rangle = E_{2} |u_{2}\rangle<br /> Hint for (ii): \langle u_{1} | u_{1} \rangle = 1 and \langle u_{2} | u_{2} \rangle = 1, and: \langle u_{1} | u_{2} \rangle =0, and \langle u_{2} | u_{1} \rangle = 0.

 

[t1mbro]

oh that's all so easy, thanks edgardo!