Einstein against Quantum theory

Waveparticle
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Im currently reading Entanglement by Amir D. Aczel. It explains the arguments for and against quantum theory at the Solvay Conference in 1930. At the conference Einstein told Bohr that he could refute the uncertainty principle for energy and time. Einstein said he designed a box with an opening in one of its walls, where a door is placed, controlled by a clock inside the box. The box is filled with radiation and weighed. The door is opened for a split second, allowing one photon to escape. The box is weighed again, from the weight difference, one can deduce the energy of the photon and thus can determine the photons energy and the time of its passage(refuting the uncertainty principle). The way Bohr found a flaw was to say that Einstein failed to account for the fact that weighing the box amounts to observing its displacement within the gravitational field. The imprecision in the displacement of the box generates an uncertainty in the determination of the mass-and hence the energy-of the photon. When the box is displaced, so is the clock inside it. It now ticks in a gravitational field that is slightly different from before. Can someone please help me understand Bohrs answer because I am having a hard time understanding why Einsteins contraption couldn't work? Why is the box displaced when you weigh it the second time?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
On a historic aside, I believe the principal source of this anecdote is Bohr's book "Discussions with Einstein ...", where Bohr's description of the discussion is less adversarial, noting "Einstein himself contributed effectively" to resolving the challenge. If your book doesn't have an illustration, it might help to look at the one from Bohr's book, http://www.informationphilosopher.com/solutions/scientists/bohr/images/Bohr-Einstein-8.jpg".

So you have this box on a scale, and to measure its mass, you're measuring its displacement on this scale. The idea is that due to the clock, you can know exactly when the photon left the box. The crux is that this will accelerate the box in the gravitational field, which due to GR, will dilate the time of the clock. When you put this time-dilation together with the momentum-position uncertainty and E=mc^2, you get back the time-energy uncertainty relation.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Is it time that is accelerating the box in the gravitational field or is it the fact that you are trying to measure this time itself. I hope this makes sense.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top