Solving Einstein Equation Confusion: My Notes vs Freidmann Equations

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on confusion regarding the Einstein equation notation, specifically the sign of the cosmological constant (Λ) in the equation G_{ab} - Λg_{ab} = xT_{ab}. The author notes discrepancies between their course notes and standard texts, suggesting that the correct form should include +Λ instead of -Λ. This inconsistency complicates the derivation of the Friedmann equations, leading to confusion in the trace calculations. It is recommended to consider the possibility of a typo in the course materials and to inform the instructor for clarification. The discussion highlights the importance of accurate notation in understanding complex equations in cosmology.
latentcorpse
Messages
1,411
Reaction score
0
My notes for a particular course say that G_{ab} - \Lambda g_{ab}= x T_{ab} where x=\frac{8 \pi G}{c^4}
Then they say that the trace of this is -R+4 \Lambda=xT
What?
Surely that's only possible if we have +\Lambda g_{ab} as I have seen in every other text I've ever read?

However, when we derive the Freidmann equations from this we get a ( \frac{\dot{a}}{a})^2=\frac{8 \pi G}{3} \rho -\frac{k}{a^2}+\frac{\Lambda}{3}
So if we had -\Lambda on the LHS as suggested in the notes then this will come over to the RHS and give a + as required by the Freidmann equations but now it is all inconsistent with the trace.

This is so confusing! Can anyone clear this up? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you sure it isn't

G_{ab} + \Lambda g_{ab}= \frac{8 \pi G}{c^4}<br /> T_{ab}

in the original Equation, that is, +Λ instead of -Λ on the left-hand side?

In case your textbook/notes actually state -Λ, then there's a strong possibility of it being a typo, and in this case, just ignore it.

I'd also recommend you to notify your tutor/professor on this.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top