(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); Einstein-Hilbert Action --> GR is a saddle point?

[Clarification: I'm not claiming GR is wrong or anything. I'm asking if there are issues in interpreting GR as an action principle, and since I assume not, why not?]

We can get the equations of GR from the Einstein-Hilbert action by finding the extremal action in variations of the metric. However, the action does not appear to be bounded below as the curvature could just go arbitrarily negative for a finite period of time. Similarly it doesn't seem to be bounded from above. So are the equations we find when solving for the extremal action actually some kind of "saddle point"?

Doesn't this prevent us from considering GR in terms of a least action principle?

Is this issue of being unbounded from below in anyway related to the problems of trying to quantize gravity?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Einstein-Hilbert Action -> GR is a saddle point?

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads - Einstein Hilbert Action | Date |
---|---|

A Strange Tetrad Form of Einstein-Hilbert Action | Jan 25, 2018 |

A Einstein Hilbert action integral | Jun 24, 2016 |

Einstein-Hilbert action origin | Oct 18, 2015 |

Einstein Hilbert action, why varies wrt metric tensor? | Mar 31, 2015 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**