Einstein views on gravitation,help

  • Thread starter Thread starter shehri
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Einstein
AI Thread Summary
Einstein's views on gravitation are primarily encapsulated in his theory of general relativity, which describes gravity as the curvature of spacetime caused by mass. Geodesics represent the paths that objects follow in this curved spacetime, analogous to straight lines in flat geometry. To understand these concepts, a foundational knowledge of special relativity is beneficial, as it lays the groundwork for grasping general relativity. Special relativity focuses on the relationship between light speed and motion, while general relativity introduces the equivalence principle, linking gravity and acceleration. For a deeper understanding, exploring online resources and introductory materials on both theories is recommended.
shehri
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Einstein views on gravitation,please. help!

Hi all,
If someone may explain in simplest manner the views of Einstein on gravitation?.Particularly I'm much confused about 'geodesics' & 'curved space time'.Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, in order to answer your question, it may be helpful if you tell us how much you know. How familiar are you with special and general relativity?
 
Not so much.Just a know how of postulates.Infact I want to get clear about curve sopace time in a simple manner.I want to study the topic of space & time but have no good book besides me.Thanks.
 
cristo is correct. It would be helpful to know more about your background. There are many good sources of this information on the internet. Google general realtivity and you will find all you want.

I will make a couple of comments. Einstien's first breakthrough in this are is special relativity which doesn't deal with gravity at all; it is a study of the relatinship between the speed of light, motions, and physical objects. Here is his original paper: http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/
I suspect it will be difficult for you, but the crux of the theory is containd in 4 simple equaiton at the end of chapter #3. These equations show the effects of relative motion on objects and time. They arise mathematically from the two postulates: the principle of relativity and the constancy of the measurement of the speed of light (actually the second one can be deduced from the first so only one principle is required.)

I suggest you learn about special relativity firs because it is simpler and requires only algebra to do real problems.

General relativity is a theory of gravity and requires only one more principle, the equivalence principle. This principle states that the effect of gravity on a point mass is indistinguishable for the effect of acceleration on that point. Unfortunately, not much can be done in general relativity without a woriking knowledge of tensor analysis.

Good luck!
 

Thread 'Struggling to understand the concept of this question (ice cube in water optics question)'

TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
View full post »
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'

Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'

Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
View full post »

Similar threads

Help with Einstein and Planck's Views Question
Replies
2
Views
2K
B How does Einstein's equation work? Why do we need to square c?
Replies
18
Views
1K
Gravitational Potential & Gravitational Potential Energy
Replies
2
Views
2K
B History of Cosmology: 1915-1929 | Einstein, Hubble & GR
Replies
19
Views
3K
Gravitational equipotential multiple choice problem
Replies
4
Views
2K
A Non-Linear Theory: Summation Meaningful in Einstein Gravitation?
Replies
15
Views
2K
I The curvature of space and curvature of spacetime
Replies
21
Views
2K
I Modern View of Quantum Phenomena
2
Replies
70
Views
1K
I The Physicist & Philosopher: Einstein vs. Bergson Debate
Replies
16
Views
2K
A Can the geodesic equation be derived from the EFE in a certain limit?
Replies
40
Views
7K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top