Undergrad Einstein's 1935 Paper on Wormholes & Modern Physics

  • Thread starter Thread starter dsaun777
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bridges Einstein
Click For Summary
Einstein's 1935 paper briefly introduced the concept of wormholes, specifically addressing singularities through the idea of bridges in spacetime. Despite its potential implications, Einstein did not further develop this concept in subsequent works. The recent proposal of ER=EPR by Susskind and Maldacena suggests a connection between entanglement and wormholes, indicating a modern interpretation of Einstein's original ideas. However, the original spacetime model discussed still contains singularities, raising questions about its compatibility with current theories like string theory. The discussion highlights the ongoing relevance of Einstein's work in contemporary physics debates.
dsaun777
Messages
296
Reaction score
39
TL;DR
Einstein Rosen Bridges
Does anybody know why Einstein never pursued the idea of wormholes beyond his very short 1935 paper? If he did does anybody know of any of his papers that go into this idea in more detail. I know recently there was the proposal of EPR=ER mainly put forth by Susskind and Maldecena. The ER=EPR seems like an implied result of Einstein's original work, to begin with. The paper was titled "the particle problem in the General Theory of Relativity" and addressed the avoidance of singularities by bridges. How does this paper pan out with modern physics like string theory and so forth?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dsaun777 said:
the avoidance of singularities by bridges

I'm not sure what this means, since the spacetime that contains the Einstein-Rosen bridge, maximally extended Schwarzschild spacetime, has singularities (two of them).

Do you have a link to the paper you refer to?
 
MOVING CLOCKS In this section, we show that clocks moving at high speeds run slowly. We construct a clock, called a light clock, using a stick of proper lenght ##L_0##, and two mirrors. The two mirrors face each other, and a pulse of light bounces back and forth betweem them. Each time the light pulse strikes one of the mirrors, say the lower mirror, the clock is said to tick. Between successive ticks the light pulse travels a distance ##2L_0## in the proper reference of frame of the clock...

Similar threads

Replies
39
Views
4K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
124
Views
17K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K