Einstein's formula for specific heat

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the derivation of Einstein's formula for specific heat, focusing on the application of statistical mechanics and the use of partition functions. Participants are exploring the mathematical steps involved in the derivation, particularly the transition from energy expressions to the specific heat formula.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes their approach using Planck's assumption of quantized energy and the mean expectation energy to derive total energy.
  • Another participant suggests using identities related to series summation to simplify the expression for total energy.
  • A different participant questions the naturalness of the step in the derivation and proposes an alternative method involving partition functions.
  • One participant expresses confusion about the negative sign encountered when applying the series identities and seeks clarification on their origin.
  • Another participant explains the concept of the partition function and its relevance to deriving thermodynamic properties.
  • Further clarification is provided regarding the identities used in the summation, linking them to binomial expansion and derivatives.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the derivation steps, with multiple approaches and some confusion regarding specific mathematical identities. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best method to derive Einstein's formula for specific heat.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion, including assumptions about familiarity with partition functions and the potential for misunderstanding the application of series identities. The derivation steps are not fully resolved, and participants express varying levels of understanding.

Piano man
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
I'm working through a derivation of Einstein's formula for specific heat and I'm stuck.

So far I've been working off Planck's assumption of quantised energy [tex]E=n\hbar\omega[/tex] and the energy probability [tex]P(E)= e^{\frac{-E}{k_b T}}[/tex], using the fact that the mean expectation energy is [tex]\langle E \rangle= \frac{\sum_n E P(E)}{\sum_n P(E)}[/tex] to get total energy [tex]U=3N\langle E \rangle=\frac{3N\sum_n n\hbar\omega e^{-n\hbar\omega/k_b T}}{\sum_n e^{-n\hbar\omega/k_b T}}[/tex]

The next step is where my problem is. The derivation I am studying says the above expression is equal to [tex]3Nk_b T\left[\frac{\hbar\omega/k_b T}{e^{\hbar\omega/k_bT}-1}\right][/tex], which when differentiated wrt T gives the Einstein formula, but I don't see how that step is made.

Any ideas?
Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
you need to remember the identities

[tex]1+x+x^{2}+....= (1-x)^{-1}[/tex]

[tex]x+2x^{2}+3x^{3}+...= -x(1-x)^{-2}[/tex]

setting [tex]x=e^{\frac{-\hbar \omega}{k_{b}.T}}[/tex] you can sum both series and get finite answers for U

Oh man , i wish physics were sooo easy nowadays too
 
I don't really see 'how' the step is made either - it doesn't look like a natural one-liner, although with sufficient ingenuity you can show why that it is correct (zetafunction has shown the level of ingenuity which is sufficient). The 'easier way' is to do the sum earlier on - by first writing down the partition function for a single oscillator, and working from there.

Have you met partition functions in the context of statistical physics before?
 
Thanks for the replies :D

zetafunction, thank you for those formulas. I tried using them and I got the correct formula out, but with a negative sign in front from the negative x in the second formula above. Where do those identities come from?

peteratcam, no I'm not familiar with partition functions. How would that work in this case?
 
Well the partition function is the sum over all energy states:
[tex]Z = \sum_i e^{-\beta E_i}[/tex]
All thermodynamic information can be derived from the partition function, for example the Helmholtz Free Energy is [tex]-kT \ln Z[/tex] and the internal energy is [tex]-\partial \ln Z/\partial \beta[/tex].

For a harmonic oscillator, calculating the partition function is as simple as knowing how to sum a geometric series. And then you can take derivatives to obtain the energy.

Look in any university level statistical physics book for more details.
 
The identity for 1+x+x^2+x^3+... = (1-x)^(-1) is just the binomial expansion. The other one is obtained by noticing that it is related to the derivative of the first.
 
ok thanks genneth, that makes sense.
So if you take the derivative of the first and multiply by x, you get x(1-x)^-2 not -x(1-x)^-2, which gives the required result.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K