Elastic and gravitational potential energy, with friction and a box on incline.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a box on an incline connected to an elastic string, where the goal is to find the coefficient of friction and the spring constant. The user attempts to solve the problem using energy equations but struggles with the interdependence of the variables for friction and spring constant. Another participant suggests a method to eliminate one variable by manipulating the equations, allowing for the calculation of the coefficient of friction first. The user expresses confusion over the problem's formulation and doubts their results, particularly regarding a friction coefficient of zero. The conversation highlights the complexities of solving physics problems with multiple variables and the utility of diagramming tools for clarity.
Nihuepana
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Elastic and gravitational potential energy

First off, long time lurker here on his first post. Your forum seems absolutely brilliant, so I hope you can help me :)

Homework Statement



A box on an elastic string is dropped down an incline and proceeds to slide the distance L before being pulled back by the string and stopping at the distance L/2. At the starting point the string is slack. Find the coefficient of friction and the spring constant.

2i1m4ic.jpg


Known data:
  • Distance, L
  • Angle of incline, Theta
  • Mass of box, m

Homework Equations


U_{{{\it el2}}}=1/2\,k{x}^{2}
U_{{{\it grav}}}=mgy
y=\sin \left( \theta \right) L
W_{{{\it res}}}=-mg\cos \left( \theta \right) \mu\,x
{\it K1}+U_{{{\it grav1}}}+W_{{{\it res12}}}={\it K2}+U_{{{\it grav2}}<br /> }+U_{{{\it el2}}}



The Attempt at a Solution


Right, so I've basically just changed x to L plugged in my attributes into {\it K1}+U_{{{\it grav1}}}+W_{{{\it res12}}}={\it K2}+U_{{{\it grav2}}<br /> }+U_{{{\it el2}}} and solved for my variables. I did first for when the box goes from point 1 to point 2, then 2 to 3 and finally 1 to 3. All three equations give me the same answer.

k:
2\,{\frac {mg \left( \sin \left( \theta \right) -\cos \left( \theta<br /> \right) \mu \right) }{L}}
mu:
{\frac {-2\,mg\sin \left( \theta \right) +kL}{mg\cos \left( \theta<br /> \right) }}

What I don't understand is why the problem is formulated as it is (why give me the information that it springs back to L/2, if I don't need it to find the constants).
Also, I was hoping that it would be possible to get equations for the constants where the unknowns doesn't figure, i.e. an equation for the spring coefficient that doesn't have mu in it and vice versa.
I've tried with all the algebra I could think of, but nothing seems to work - is there anyone who can point me to what I'm missing?
Thanks.
Simon
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF, and my compliments for the really nice diagram!

The trouble is you have μ and k in both expressions, so it isn't "solved".
You must have had these equations at one point:
mg(sinθ + μcosθ) = .5*kL and mg(sinθ - μcosθ) = .5*kL
If you subtract one from the other, you will eliminate k so you have the value of μ. Sub that into one of the original equations and solve for k.
 
Thank you very much, Inkscape and Maple makes writing here a lot easier :)
I found the expressions you mentioned from my own, but oddly enough I ended up with mu = 0, which I doubt is correct, giving the way the problem was formulated. It'll have to do for now though :)
 
I agree with that! Looks like the problem was cooked up to make the answers work out nicely.

I use SmartDraw myself, but I'm downloading Inkscape to see how it works. Draw programs are wonderful!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top