Elastic Collision: Express Velocity u in Terms of m,M,v

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around an elastic collision problem involving two balls with masses m and M, both initially moving at the same speed v. The goal is to express the velocity u of the smaller ball after the collision in terms of m, M, and v. Through the application of momentum conservation and the equations governing elastic collisions, the derived expression for u is u = v(3 - m/M) / (1 - m/M). Participants noted that if m equals M, the result suggests an infinite velocity for u, prompting questions about the physical interpretation of this scenario. The conversation highlights the importance of careful sign management in the calculations.
espen180
Messages
831
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



When two balls are dropped like shown in situation 1 in the figure, the top ball shoots up after the impact, while the bottom ball loses some of its mechanical energy, as seen in situation 3. By simplifying the situation, we can assume that the bottom ball stops and bounces up before the top ball, so we get an elastic collision between the two, as shown in situations 2 and 4. If the mass of the small ball is m and the mass of the large ball is M and they have the same speed v before the collision and velocities u and U after, what is u is terms of m,M,v?

Problem may be rewritten and simplifyed as:

Two spheres with masses m and M collide head on with the same speed |v| and exit the collision with velocities u and U. The collision is elastic. Express u in terms of m, M and v

http://img401.imageshack.us/img401/4555/fysikkkollisjon.png

Homework Equations



Definition of momentum: p=mv (1)

Conservation of momentum: \Delta \Sigma p=0 (2)

For elastic collisions:
v_1+u_1=v_2+u_2 (3) (v=initial velocity , u=velocity after collision)


The Attempt at a Solution



The problem is one-dimentional, so I have omitted the usual vector notation and instead defined a positive direction, to the right in situation 4 in the figure.
Inserting values into the equations, we get
(2)Mv-mv=MU+mu

U=\frac{Mv-mv-mu}{M}

(3)u-v=v+U

substituting for U:

u-v=v+v-\frac{m}{M}(v-u)

u+\frac{m}{M}u=3v-\frac{m}{M}v

u(1+\frac{m}{M})=v(3-\frac{m}{M})

u=v\frac{3-\frac{m}{M}}{1+\frac{m}{M}}

So I have a solution. Is it reasonable? I think so, on the grounds that u=v when m=M.

What do you think?

Thanks for any help.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
One step is wrong.
u - v = v + v - m/M*(v + u )
 
Thanks for pointing that out.
So it will be like this then:

u-v=v+v-\frac{m}{M}(v+u)

u-\frac{m}{M}u=3v-\frac{m}{M}v

u(1-\frac{m}{M})=v(3-\frac{m}{M})

u=v\frac{3-\frac{m}{M}}{1-\frac{m}{M}}

But now, if m=M, u is infinately large. How do I explain that?
 
Careful with your signs on the second line :wink:
 
Oh yeah! The first line was wrong, but the others were correct, so I had the right expression from the start, right?
 
espen180 said:
Oh yeah! The first line was wrong, but the others were correct, so I had the right expression from the start, right?
Indeed you did :smile:
 
Troublesome sign errors. :rolleyes:

Thanks for the help!
 
Back
Top