Elastic Potential: U and F Explained for James

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter James Starligh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Elastic Potential
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
5 replies · 2K views
James Starligh
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Collegues,

please just remind me

if I have elastic potential U=( K(x-X0)^2 )/2 for the flexible spring moved on X distance from the initial X0 position So I have I have elastic force F=K(x0+vt-x) which is the derivative of the U. Its not clear for me why vt term which should be equal to x in this equation is present ? From the general assumption (x-X0)^2 should be x^2-2*X*X0+X0^2 where is the vt term here?



James
 
Physics news on Phys.org
what's vt?

looks like you differentiated incorrectly.
 
x = V (velosity) * t (time)
both of that formulas are from textbooks.

Reasonable U= (Kx^2)/2 so force = kx. wehat fould be force if U=( K(x-X0)^2 )/2 in case when we moved body from the initial position (Xo) on X. The delta X should give us velosity should it?
 
x = vt is for a body moving at constant velocity for a time t. I wouldn't have thought this was the case here. So we have simply

[itex]U = \frac{1}{2}k(x - x_0)^2[/itex]

[itex]F = -\frac{dU}{dx} = -k(x - x_0)[/itex] (having used chain rule)

The minus sign in front of the k indicates that the force is in the -x direction.
 
Thanks!

Some calculus:
In the F=K(x0+vt-x) dealing with the constant velosity vt should be equal to 0, shouldn't it?

In the chain rule we have f(x)= x-x0 and g(y)=y^2 so solving it we obtain that (x-xo)' should be 1. I don't understand why its not 0.

James
 
James Starligh said:
In the F=K(x0+vt-x) dealing with the constant velosity vt should be equal to 0, shouldn't it?

Don't understand why you're bringing in vt, especially since you seem to have both x and vt in this equation. Stick with just x, unless you're sure that x really does vary with time as x = vt.

James Starligh said:
In the chain rule we have f(x)= x-x0 and g(y)=y^2 so solving it we obtain that (x-xo)' should be 1. I don't understand why its not 0.

[itex]\frac{d}{dx}\frac{1}{2}k(x - x_0)^2 = \frac{1}{2}\frac{d}{du}u^2 \frac {du}{dx}[/itex]

in which [itex]u = (x - x_0)[/itex] so [itex]\frac{du}{dx} = 1[/itex]

and [itex]\frac{d}{du}u^2 = 2u[/itex]

So [itex]\frac{d}{dx}\frac{1}{2}k(x - x_0)^2 =k(x - x_0)[/itex].
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person