Elastic Potential: U and F Explained for James

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter James Starligh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Elastic Potential
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concepts of elastic potential energy and force as they relate to a spring system. Participants explore the mathematical relationships and derivations involved, particularly focusing on the terms used in the equations and their implications for understanding elastic force and potential energy.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • James presents the elastic potential energy formula U = (K(x - X0)^2)/2 and questions the presence of the vt term in the force equation F = K(x0 + vt - x).
  • Some participants suggest that the vt term may not be necessary or relevant in this context, with one questioning the differentiation process used by James.
  • Another participant clarifies that x = vt is applicable for a body moving at constant velocity, but expresses skepticism about its relevance to the current problem.
  • There is a discussion about the implications of using the chain rule in the differentiation of the potential energy function, with James asserting that the derivative should yield a result of 1, while others challenge this interpretation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the relevance of the vt term in the equations or the correctness of the differentiation process. Multiple competing views remain regarding the application of these concepts.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions about the assumptions underlying the use of the vt term and the conditions under which the equations are applied. The discussion reflects varying interpretations of the mathematical relationships involved.

James Starligh
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Collegues,

please just remind me

if I have elastic potential U=( K(x-X0)^2 )/2 for the flexible spring moved on X distance from the initial X0 position So I have I have elastic force F=K(x0+vt-x) which is the derivative of the U. Its not clear for me why vt term which should be equal to x in this equation is present ? From the general assumption (x-X0)^2 should be x^2-2*X*X0+X0^2 where is the vt term here?



James
 
Physics news on Phys.org
what's vt?

looks like you differentiated incorrectly.
 
x = V (velosity) * t (time)
both of that formulas are from textbooks.

Reasonable U= (Kx^2)/2 so force = kx. wehat fould be force if U=( K(x-X0)^2 )/2 in case when we moved body from the initial position (Xo) on X. The delta X should give us velosity should it?
 
x = vt is for a body moving at constant velocity for a time t. I wouldn't have thought this was the case here. So we have simply

[itex]U = \frac{1}{2}k(x - x_0)^2[/itex]

[itex]F = -\frac{dU}{dx} = -k(x - x_0)[/itex] (having used chain rule)

The minus sign in front of the k indicates that the force is in the -x direction.
 
Thanks!

Some calculus:
In the F=K(x0+vt-x) dealing with the constant velosity vt should be equal to 0, shouldn't it?

In the chain rule we have f(x)= x-x0 and g(y)=y^2 so solving it we obtain that (x-xo)' should be 1. I don't understand why its not 0.

James
 
James Starligh said:
In the F=K(x0+vt-x) dealing with the constant velosity vt should be equal to 0, shouldn't it?

Don't understand why you're bringing in vt, especially since you seem to have both x and vt in this equation. Stick with just x, unless you're sure that x really does vary with time as x = vt.

James Starligh said:
In the chain rule we have f(x)= x-x0 and g(y)=y^2 so solving it we obtain that (x-xo)' should be 1. I don't understand why its not 0.

[itex]\frac{d}{dx}\frac{1}{2}k(x - x_0)^2 = \frac{1}{2}\frac{d}{du}u^2 \frac {du}{dx}[/itex]

in which [itex]u = (x - x_0)[/itex] so [itex]\frac{du}{dx} = 1[/itex]

and [itex]\frac{d}{du}u^2 = 2u[/itex]

So [itex]\frac{d}{dx}\frac{1}{2}k(x - x_0)^2 =k(x - x_0)[/itex].
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
7K