Electric Charges: Forces on A and C Explained

AI Thread Summary
Two equally charged conducting spheres, A and B, repel each other with a force of 2.0 x 10^5 Newtons. When an uncharged sphere, C, touches A, it acquires half of A's charge, resulting in both A and C having a charge of q/2. The electric force on A remains unchanged, while the force on C, positioned halfway between A and B, can be calculated using the formula F = k(3/2)q*(1/2)q/r^2. This leads to a new force expression that combines the charges of A and B with the charge of C. The discussion emphasizes the importance of charge distribution upon contact between conductors.
yoleven
Messages
78
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Two equally charged identical conducting spheres, A and B, repel each other with a force of 2.0 x 10^5 Newton. Another identical uncharged sphere, C, is touched to A and then moved over right next to B.
What is the electric force on A now?
What is the electric force on C after it has touched A and is halfway between A and B?


Homework Equations


F=K q^2/r^2



The Attempt at a Solution


I let q arbitrarily equal 1.0x 10^-6 Nm^2/C^2
I determined the distance to be 21.2 m
If A is negatively charged at 1.0 x 10^-6 does C touching it take half of that charge?
If so, does A and C now have a charge of 5.0 x 10^-7?
I'm not sure what happens to the charge when A and C touch.
If they are halved, then the electric force on A remains the same and
the force on C remains the same when it is at half the distance.
I would love some help with this, please.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't assume arbitrary numerical values and make things messy. Let's suppose the charge on A and B is q each. If their dist is r, F = k*q^2/r^2.

After touching, the charge q will distribute itself equally on A and C, since they are conductors. So, A and C each has q/2.

If you now place C very close to B, then there is a net charge of 3q/2 there, and q/2 at A. So, force F1 = k(3/2)q*(1/2)q/r^2 = k*3q^2/(4r^2).

We can now find how many times is F1 of F.

Can you do the 2nd part now?
 
Yes, I've got it now. Thank you very much!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top