Electric field acting on the source charge

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the electric force acting on the northern hemisphere of a uniformly charged sphere due to the southern hemisphere. Participants explore the application of Gauss's law and the implications of including the electric field contributions from the object being analyzed.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the validity of including the electric field from the northern hemisphere itself when calculating the force acting on it.
  • Another participant suggests that the initial concern may stem from a misunderstanding related to point particles.
  • A detailed breakdown of the force calculation process is provided, emphasizing the need to consider both the force from the southern hemisphere and the internal forces among fractions of the northern hemisphere.
  • It is noted that internal forces within the northern hemisphere cancel each other out, allowing the force acting on it to be attributed solely to the southern hemisphere.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether the electric field from the northern hemisphere should be included in the force calculation, indicating that there is no consensus on this aspect of the problem.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions regarding the nature of electric fields and forces in continuous charge distributions may not be fully articulated, leading to potential gaps in understanding the implications of including or excluding certain fields.

Mayan Fung
Messages
131
Reaction score
14
I am reading Griffith's textbook on EM. There is a problem asking to find the force acting on the northern hemisphere by the southern hemisphere of a uniformly charged sphere.

The solution idea is to find the expression of the E field by Gauss's law and integrate the force over the northern hemisphere. However, part of the total electric field is contributed by the northern hemisphere itself. In my understanding, we should not include the electric field of the object we are calculating the force on it. I wonder why we can solve this problem with this approach?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Chan Pok Fung said:
In my understanding, we should not include the electric field of the object we are calculating the force on it.
I think you are thinking of point particles.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vanadium 50
There is a straight-forward explanation if we break down the process of "calculating the force":

- In order to calculate the force acting on the Northern Hemisphere (NH), we can break the NH down into tiny fractions and calculate the "forces that act on each of those fractions", including:
--> The force that the Southern Hemisphere (SH) act on the fraction
--> The forces between NH fractions

- Then, we can calculate the force that act on the HM by adding all the "forces that act on each of those fractions". In doing so, we will have two sums:
--> Total force that the SH act on all the fractions of NH
===> This is the force that SH act NH as a whole
--> Total force of interaction between NH fractions
===> According to Newton's Third Law of Motion, every force has a counter-force, so the sum of the internal forces of all those fractions would ultimately add up to zero.

In short, we can claim that the force acting on the NH was from the SH (although there are internal interaction in the NH, those interactions canceled each other).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: starprince, Mayan Fung, vanhees71 and 1 other person
Vinh Nguyen said:
There is a straight-forward explanation if we break down the process of "calculating the force":

- In order to calculate the force acting on the Northern Hemisphere (NH), we can break the NH down into tiny fractions and calculate the "forces that act on each of those fractions", including:
--> The force that the Southern Hemisphere (SH) act on the fraction
--> The forces between NH fractions

- Then, we can calculate the force that act on the HM by adding all the "forces that act on each of those fractions". In doing so, we will have two sums:
--> Total force that the SH act on all the fractions of NH
===> This is the force that SH act NH as a whole
--> Total force of interaction between NH fractions
===> According to Newton's Third Law of Motion, every force has a counter-force, so the sum of the internal forces of all those fractions would ultimately add up to zero.

In short, we can claim that the force acting on the NH was from the SH (although there are internal interaction in the NH, those interactions canceled each other).

That's very clear. Thanks!
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: starprince, Dale and Vinh Nguyen

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
620
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
961
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
6K