Electric field at the center of the equilateral triangle

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the electric field at the center of an equilateral triangle formed by three point charges, specifically focusing on the contributions from each charge and the resulting net electric field. The subject area is electrostatics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of the electric field contributions from each charge, questioning the use of absolute values for the charges and the implications of charge signs on the net electric field. There are attempts to clarify the reasoning behind the calculations and the discrepancies with the answer key.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants exploring different interpretations of the calculations. Some express confidence in their results, while others suggest potential errors in the answer key. There is no explicit consensus on the correct answer, but several participants are engaged in verifying their calculations and reasoning.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential typos in charge values and the importance of charge signs in determining the direction of the electric field. The original poster is seeking clarification on their calculations in light of the answer key's discrepancy.

hellowmad
Messages
11
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
Consider an equilateral triangle of side 20. cm. A charge of +2.0 μC is placed at one vertex and charges of -4.0 μC are placed at the other two vertices. Determine the magnitude and direction of the electric field at the center of the triangle.
Relevant Equations
E = kQ1/r^2
I've found the distance from each point to the center, which is equal to r=20x1.732/3 = 11.55 cm.
I find out that E2 and E3 due to -4µEyC on x-direction canceled each other.
The E2y = E3Y = EY = E2Ycos60 = E2/2 = [(KQ2)/r^2]/2
So the net E-field:
E = E1 +E2y+E3Y
=kQ1/r^2 + [(KQ2)/r^2]/2 + [(KQ2)/r^2]/2
= kQ1/r^2 + (KQ2)/r^2
= (k/r^2) (|Q1|+|Q2|)
= (9 x 10^9/0.1155^2) [(0.000002) + (0.000006)]
= 4.05x10^ N/C
= 4.05x10^ V/m

However, answer key say it should be 2.7x10^6 V/m. Do I do something wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hellowmad said:
kQ1/r^2 + (KQ2)/r^2
= (k/r^2) (|Q1|+|Q2|)
Where did the modulus signs come from?
 
It is not modulus sign. it just means absolute number only. So, it stands as 2µC and 4µC.
 
hellowmad said:
It is not modulus sign. it just means absolute number only. So, it stands as 2µC and 4µC.
That is what I mean by modulus here, the absolute value. Why are you taking the absolute values of the charges?
 
No matter what charge places on the center of triangle, the E field direction of two -4µC's Y-direction is the same as that of 2µC one. The final E-field is the sum of them, So I take the absolute values of the charges here. Thanks
 
hellowmad said:
= (k/r^2) (|Q1|+|Q2|)
= (9 x 10^9/0.1155^2) [(0.000002) + (0.000006)]
|Q2| is 4 μC , not 6 μC. But I think this is just a typo. The total inside the square brackets is 6 μC.

hellowmad said:
= 4.05x10^ N/C
= 4.05x10^ V/m
This looks correct to me if you intended the power of 10 to be 6.

hellowmad said:
However, answer key say it should be 2.7x10^6 V/m.
I think the key is wrong and your answer is right.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hellowmad and MatinSAR
Thank TSny. Yes couple typo. Sorry for that. My answer is 4.05x10^6 V/m.

Thank you everyone
 
hellowmad said:
No matter what charge places on the center of triangle, the E field direction of two -4µC's Y-direction is the same as that of 2µC one. The final E-field is the sum of them, So I take the absolute values of the charges here. Thanks
Right, but that's a dodgy way to fix it. Your working should have been
hellowmad said:
E = E1 +E2y+E3Y
=kQ1/r^2 - [(KQ2)/r^2]/2 - [(KQ2)/r^2]/2
= kQ1/r^2 - (KQ2)/r^2
= (k/r^2) (Q1-Q2)
The minus signs in line 2 reflect the fact that those charges are on the opposite side.

Btw, the book answer is exactly 2/3 of yours. That should be a clue as to where they went wrong, but I can't pick it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hellowmad, MatinSAR and SammyS
Yes, this is the point I post here to see if I forget something or make a mistake.
 
  • #10
hellowmad said:
Yes, this is the point I post here to see if I forget something or make a mistake.
I repeated the calculation and I agree with your answer. It does not look like you have made a mistake or overlooked something.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hellowmad and MatinSAR
  • #11
Thank you so much kuruman
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kuruman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K