Electric Field: Does a Circular Set of Charges Appear as One?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rockyshephear
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charges
rockyshephear
Messages
232
Reaction score
0
Would a perfectly circular set of point charges appear to be one point charge if you could see the electric field?
Same question with perfectly circular set of dipoles.
My question is posed because I saw an illustration

http://images.google.com/imgres?img...ric+Field&hl=en&rlz=1G1GGLQ_ENUS337&sa=X&um=1

that seems to indicate that a collection of charges can show as one point charge.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
This is a physics question, not a math question.

If you are far back enough, then it is like a point source.
 
I posted in the physics section.
 
rockyshephear said:
Would a perfectly circular set of point charges appear to be one point charge if you could see the electric field?

Any system with a charge distribution that has spherical symmetry will have the same electric field at any given radius "r" as you would get from a simple system containing just one point charge (at the center), where the value of this point charge is equal to the sum of all the charge which lay within a sphere of radius "r" in the original system.

BTW. This is a direct consequence of the Gauss divergence theorem. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divergence_theorem
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top