Electric field from a polarized metal sphere?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the effect of a polarized metal sphere on the electric field created by a nearby positive point charge. When the sphere is introduced, it becomes polarized, which may influence the electric field at specific points between the two objects. The polarization of the sphere could create a distribution of positive and negative charges that might either enhance or cancel the electric field at those points. A comparison is made to a dipole configuration, where the electric field can be calculated by vector addition of the fields from each charge. Ultimately, the scenario with the polarized sphere is viewed as a variation of the dipole situation, requiring similar analytical approaches.
txaggiechick
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
First, there is a positive point charge sitting in space which creates an electric field around it. Then, a large metal sphere with no net charge is a added some distance to the left of it. Does the addition of this sphere change the magnitude of the electric field at some points a and b which are in between these two objects?


So I know that the large metal sphere will now be polarized but I am not sure if this polarization will have a force on this these spots or if it will cancel out since one side is negative and one side is positive
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Suppose you replaced your sphere by two point charges, one positive and one negative (a dipole) with the negative charge of the dipole towards the given positive charge. How would you answer the question then? You'd just add up the vectors at your points a and b taking into account the distance of a and b from the three charges. The sphere problem is just a variation on this situation.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top