Electric field in magnetostatics?

AI Thread Summary
In magnetostatics, steady currents create electric fields, but traditional Coulomb's law does not apply due to the movement of charges. The electric field equations can still be derived from Maxwell's Equations, which remain valid in this context. The continuity equation indicates that the net charge in any differential volume is zero for steady currents. Additionally, Ohm's Law applies in this scenario, linking current density to the electric field. Overall, magnetostatic conditions allow for a consistent treatment of electric fields despite the presence of currents.
Arham
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Hello

In magnetostatics theory, there exists a current of charges. So in this situation charges are not stationary, and the Coulomb's law, and all the relations derived from it, are not valid. My question is how can we obtain electric field when dealing with steady currents (within magnetostatics theory)?

sorry for bad english
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In magnetostatics, i.e., for time-dependent fields, charge distributions and currents, the equations for the electric field decouple, and for the electric field the rules of electrostatics still hold. You see this by writing Maxwell's Equations for this special case (in Heaviside-Lorentz units):

\vec{\nabla} \times \vec{E}=0, \quad \vec{\nabla} \cdot (\epsilon \vec{E})=\rho, \quad \vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{B}=0, \quad \vec{\nabla} \times \frac{\vec{B}}{\mu} = \frac{1}{c} \vec{j}.

Here, I've already worked in the usual consitutive equations for an isotropic medium in nonrelavistic approximation, \vec{B}=\mu \vec{H} and \vec{D}=\epsilon \vec{E}. Finally you need Ohm's Law (here also in its nonrelativistic approximation) \vec{j}=\sigma \vec{E}.
 
Thanks for your good and clear answer. The only thing I'd like to correct is that in magnetostatics fields are NOT time-dependent.
 
Hi Arham,

For me, current is different from a motion of free charges. In case of current, the net charge in every differential volume is zero. Is this kind of related to your question?
 
Hassan2 said:
In case of current, the net charge in every differential volume is zero.

Hi

Consider a beam of electrons. It is a non-neutral current of charges. You can assign a current density to it. In magnetostatics, currents are steady, so \partial\rho/\partial t=0, and the continuity equation becomes: \nabla.J=0, where J denotes the current density.
 
Arham said:
Thanks for your good and clear answer. The only thing I'd like to correct is that in magnetostatics fields are NOT time-dependent.

Sure, that's a typo. I wanted to write "time-independent fields"...
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
764
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
52
Views
8K
Replies
10
Views
1K
Back
Top