Electric field inside a parallel plate capacitor

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the electric field inside a parallel plate capacitor, specifically using Gauss' law to analyze the electric field generated by two oppositely charged plates. Participants are exploring the implications of Gaussian surfaces and the conditions under which the electric field can be considered zero.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of Gaussian surfaces, particularly a "pillbox," to analyze the electric field between charged plates. Questions arise regarding why the electric field is not zero in this region despite enclosing no charge.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants questioning and clarifying the relationship between enclosed charge and electric field strength. Some guidance has been offered regarding the implications of using a Gaussian surface in different scenarios, but no consensus has been reached on the underlying principles.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of Gauss' law and its application to different geometries, including parallel plates and spherical shells, while acknowledging potential misconceptions about electric fields in regions with no enclosed charge.

beardo34
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Ok I took E&M about 3 years ago and decided I needed to review it. I'm up to gauss' law and am getting confused about one thing. If you have two infinitely long oppositely charged plates, solving for the total e field inside is done by making two gaussian surfaces that enclose each plate. Doing this gives the e field to be a constant between the plates.

My question is, why can't I make a gaussian "pillbox" inside the plates and enclosing zero charge and conclude that the flux through that surface is zero since the field goes in one side and leaves through the other? Obviously I'm making a mistake here somewhere because the field in between the plates is NOT zero but I can't figure out what the mistake is.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
beardo34 said:
Ok I took E&M about 3 years ago and decided I needed to review it. I'm up to gauss' law and am getting confused about one thing. If you have two infinitely long oppositely charged plates, solving for the total e field inside is done by making two gaussian surfaces that enclose each plate. Doing this gives the e field to be a constant between the plates.

My question is, why can't I make a gaussian "pillbox" inside the plates and enclosing zero charge and conclude that the flux through that surface is zero since the field goes in one side and leaves through the other? Obviously I'm making a mistake here somewhere because the field in between the plates is NOT zero but I can't figure out what the mistake is.

Sure you can do that. The conclusion from Gauss' law is that the pillbox encloses no charge. This is not an unexpected result :smile:
 
Okay but doesn't that mean the electric field inside that pillbox is zero? I am just getting confused because when you have a charged spherical shell, the field inside is zero because there is no charge.
 
beardo34 said:
Okay but doesn't that mean the electric field inside that pillbox is zero? I am just getting confused because when you have a charged spherical shell, the field inside is zero because there is no charge.

No, you can place such a pillbox anywhere in a given electric field where the enclosed charge is zero, yet there is still a field. This tells you that there is no contribution to the field from inside the pillbox.

The Gaussian surface inside a charged spherical shell tells you the same thing -- no enclosed charge and no contribution from inside the pillbox. The field inside the shell is zero for other reasons (see: Newton's Shell Theorem).
 
Ohh okay, that's what I was missing. Thanks a lot!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
6K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K