Electric Field Intensity and Potential Difference

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating electric field intensity and potential difference using the equations E = kc(q/r^2) and ∆V = -Ed. The electric field intensity was determined to be 380 N/C, while the potential difference was calculated as -3,800 Volts. Participants emphasized the importance of distinguishing between the test charge and the source charge in these calculations, clarifying that q0 is not necessary for this problem. The calculations were confirmed to be correct, although the negative sign in the potential difference raised questions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric field concepts and formulas
  • Familiarity with Coulomb's law and its application
  • Knowledge of potential difference and its calculation
  • Ability to distinguish between test charge and source charge
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of Coulomb's law in electric field calculations
  • Learn about the relationship between electric field intensity and potential difference
  • Explore the concept of test charge versus source charge in electrostatics
  • Investigate the implications of negative potential difference in electric fields
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electromagnetism, physics educators, and anyone looking to deepen their understanding of electric fields and potential differences.

Illuminitwit
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A man walks into an electric field with a small charged object that has a charged value of 4.2 E-6C. At a distance of 10m from the object that is responsible for the electric field, he notices a force of 8.0 N on the object he is carrying.

What is the electric field intensity?
What is the potential difference?


Homework Equations


E = kc(q/r^2)
F = kc(q1q2/r^2)
∆V = -Ed


The Attempt at a Solution


F = kc(q1q2/r^2)
8.0 = 9 E9 • (4.2 E-6 • q2) / 10^2
800 = 9 E9 • 4.2 E-6 • q2
800/(9 E9 • 4.2 E-6) = q2 = 2.1 E-2

E = kc(q/r^2)
E = 9 E9 • (4.2 E-6 / 10^2)
E = 378
Round to two significant figures:
E = 380

[Interesting, but unnecessary; F/E = q2]

∆V = -Ed
∆V = -380 • 10
∆V = -3800

I think the first set of equations where I used F were unnecessary.
The electric field intensity = 380 N/C.
The potential difference is = -3,800 Volts.

I really don't think I did this right. The numbers I ended up with look too large, and I don't know if volts are supposed to be negative. I don't understand what "q" is supposed to be. Is it the difference between q1 and q2? What's q0? Does it even have a real value? I went through all the material and it still doesn't make sense!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's late and I'm not sure if I'm looking at this properly, but I would just like to say to take another look at the equations for your electric field calculations.

There are two different charges in the problem, so be careful distinguishing which one is the "test charge" and which one is the "source charge". The same goes with the charges your using in your electric field equations.

I hope that helps.
 
E = Fe/q0
 
Is this approach correct?

(F/kc)r^2 = q
E = kc(q/r^2)
∆V = -Ed
 
q0 = 4.2 E -6?
 
By q0, do you mean the elementary charge?
 
If your still on this question:

You could actually use two approaches to calculate the electric field, you've given the equations. You might want to go over your notes a little more to gain some insight and, the potential difference looks right, but as for the negative, I'm not quite sure, sorry.

Anyhow, like I said before, distinguish between your test charge and your source charge, you seem to be mixing that up.

This "object that is responsible for the electric field" would be the source charge, the one in the question that's giving the force. So, the other would be the test charge.

As far as the equations go, E=Fe/q can be used, and so can E=kq1/r^2, but it requires more work. One thing to remember is that E=Fe/q is referring to the test charge, while E=kq1/r^2 is referring to the source charge.

And I'm not sure what q0 is referring too, but I don't believe you need it here anyways.

I would suggest you try both -- to make sure I'm right (I'm wrong as often as I'm right) -- and so you get some more practice and see the relationships a little better. And by the way, something you will probably kick yourself about, you did calculate the source charge to do the calculation the long way, but then you mixed up the charges when you went to solve for the electric field, so fe=kq1q2/r^2 isn't worthless here.

Hope I helped, good luck!
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K