Electric field of a sphere whit a cavity inside

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field of a sphere with a spherical cavity, with the initial calculation yielding E = ρr/(6ε₀). Participants point out that the lack of spherical symmetry complicates the problem, suggesting that the electric field will vary based on the coordinates. They recommend using the superposition principle to calculate the field by considering the entire sphere's electric field and subtracting the effect of the cavity. One participant acknowledges a mistake in their initial approach due to an incorrect reference frame. The consensus emphasizes the importance of symmetry and proper reference points in solving such problems.
Casco
Messages
82
Reaction score
1
Hi, I calculated the electric field of a sphere of radius r with a volumen density charge \rho and also it has inside of it a spherical cavity and its center is situated in r/2 with radius r/2, so I calculated the electric field of the sphere with the cavity inside and I get


E=\frac{\rho r}{6\epsilon_0 }

So I'd like if someone has done this exercise please correct or confirm my result. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Casco said:
Hi, I calculated the electric field of a sphere of radius r with a volumen density charge \rho and also it has inside of it a spherical cavity and its center is situated in r/2 with radius r/2, so I calculated the electric field of the sphere with the cavity inside and I get


E=\frac{\rho r}{6\epsilon_0 }

So I'd like if someone has done this exercise please correct or confirm my result. Thanks.

For what point have you done the calculation?
The field has no spherical symmetry and the field will depend on all three coordinates (in Cartesian coordinates) or on the angles (in spherical coordinates).
Your answer may be valid for points along some specific direction. Usually the problem requires to calculate the field for points along the axis that passes through the centers of the two spheres.
The easiest way to treat this problem is superposition.
Gauss' law is not very useful I think, due to lack of symmetry.
 
I've just deleted my answer from before. I was solving the wrong question, because I've not realized that the hole is not in the center of the bigger sphere but displaced. Indeed, here the superposition principle is the better way to solve the problem. Sorry, if I caused any confusion.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top