Electric field of a uniformly charged disk

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the charge of a uniformly charged disk by examining infinitesimal charges of concentric rings. The confusion arises from the use of the area formula for a ring, specifically dq = σ(2πr dr), instead of the more precise area calculation of ∏(R2^2 - R1^2). It is clarified that the approximation used is valid when dr is small, as it simplifies calculations without significant loss of accuracy. The approximation improves as dr decreases, making it a practical approach for the problem. The explanation resolves the initial confusion regarding the area calculation.
member 392791
Hello,

I am looking at an example of finding the charge of a uniform disk with a continuous charge on the surface.

They go about the problem by finding the infinitesimal charge of concentric rings

dq = σdA = σ(2πr dr)

The part I don't understand is that they use the area as 2πr dr? The area of a ring would be ∏(R2^2 - R1^2), right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Woopydalan said:
The area of a ring would be ∏(R2^2 - R1^2), right?

Correct, that's the exact area of the ring. However, if dr = R2 - R1 is small, the other formula is a very good approximation, which gets better and better as dr becomes smaller and smaller. To see this, let R2 = R1 + dr in the equation above, cancel out whatever you can, and then drop any terms with (dr)^2. Those terms become negligible compared to terms with just dr, when dr is very small.
 
Ok I just calculated it and now I see. The book didn't even bother to explain that approximation, which left me confused. Thank you for clearing that up so quickly =)
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top