Electric Field over a charged cylinder using only Coulomb's Law

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The electric field at a point on the central axis of a solid, uniformly charged cylinder can be calculated using Coulomb's Law and involves a triple integral setup. The integral derived is \bar{E}_{z}=\frac{2\pi\rho}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}}\int^{h/2}_{-h/2}[1-\frac{z'-z}{\sqrt{(z'-z)^{2}+R^{2}}}]dz. A common mistake arises from incorrectly assuming that \frac{z'-z}{\sqrt{(z'-z)^2}} = 1, which leads to complications in the integration process. The resulting expression includes logarithmic terms that do not simplify to zero when evaluated at z' = 0.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Coulomb's Law
  • Familiarity with triple integrals in calculus
  • Knowledge of electric field concepts
  • Experience with logarithmic functions and their properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the derivation of electric fields using Coulomb's Law
  • Study the properties of integrals involving absolute values
  • Learn about the implications of symmetry in electric fields
  • Explore advanced integration techniques for complex functions
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electromagnetism, physics educators, and anyone involved in solving problems related to electric fields and charged objects.

PeteyCoco
Messages
37
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



What is the electric field at a point on the central axis of a solid, uniformly charged cylinder of radis R and length h?

Homework Equations



Well, I've set up the triple integral and have gotten to this point:

\bar{E}_{z}=\frac{2\pi\rho}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}}\int^{h/2}_{-h/2}[1-\frac{z'-z}{\sqrt{(z'-z)^{2}+R^{2}}}]dz , z' is the location of the test point

When I integrate this I get a constant term and a mess of logarithms. I know that the field should be 0 when z' = 0, but it doesn't check out. What's wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
PeteyCoco said:
Well, I've set up the triple integral and have gotten to this point:

\bar{E}_{z}=\frac{2\pi\rho}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}}\int^{h/2}_{-h/2}[1-\frac{z'-z}{\sqrt{(z'-z)^{2}+R^{2}}}]dz

Re-evaluate how you got the 1 inside the brackets in the expression above. I suspect that you got this from assuming that ##\frac{z'-z}{\sqrt{(z'-z)^2}} = 1##. But, recall that ##\sqrt{x^2} = |x|##.
 
Alright. Now that I've changed that term, it vanishes when integrated, but the second term in the integrand still turns into

\frac{1}{2}ln| (z'-z) + \sqrt{(z'-z)^{2}+R^{2}} |^{h/2}_{-h/2}

Which, as far as I can tell, can't be reduced to 0 when z' = 0
 
Nevermind, integrating this absolute value function is a bit more work than I thought it was.
 
Also, I don't see how you are getting a logarithm expression in the result of the integration.
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
879
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K