Electric Field Strength Between Two Charges

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the point at which the electric field strength is zero between two isolated point charges, -7 μC and +2 μC, positioned at a fixed distance apart. Participants explore the implications of the electric field equations and the concept of superposition in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need to find the distance where the electric field strengths from both charges are equal. There are attempts to set up equations based on the electric field formula and considerations of distance. Questions arise about the correct interpretation of distances involved and the application of the principle of superposition.

Discussion Status

There is active engagement with multiple interpretations of the problem. Some participants provide guidance on using the principle of superposition, while others raise questions about the setup of equations and the assumptions made regarding distances. The discussion is ongoing, with no clear consensus yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the correct distances to use in their equations and the implications of negative values in their calculations. There is also mention of homework constraints and the challenge of visualizing the problem without proper diagrams.

rnjscksdyd
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two isolated point charges, -7 μC and +2 μC, are at a fixed distance apart. At which point is it possible for the electric field strength to be zero?

(A)......(B)...(C).....(D)
o----------------------o----------o---------------o
......-7 μC...+2 μC

I don't know how to insert image
sorry for messy drawing (I had to put little dots because it wouldn't make spaces although I spaced them out)

Homework Equations


F= k(q1)(q2)/r^2
E = F/q

The Attempt at a Solution


The actual answer is (D).

By these two equations, I got
E = kq/r^2

I thought, to make the field strength 0, I had to find the distance at which the field strength of these two charges are equal.

∴ E = E
kq/r^2 = kq/r^2
k(-7 μC )/r^2 = k(+2 μC)/r^2
I know this is way off,,, since I will cancel out the distance!
I actually did choose the right answer (D) simply because -7 μC has larger magnitude that field strength would be much smaller at (D)

Please tell me how I can solve this algebraically. Thank you :D
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi rnjscksdyd! welcome to pf! :smile:
rnjscksdyd said:
I thought, to make the field strength 0, I had to find the distance at which the field strength of these two charges are equal.

correct :smile:
∴ E = E
kq/r^2 = kq/r^2
k(-7 μC )/r^2 = k(+2 μC)/r^2

no, it isn't the same r, is it? :wink:
 
Try and us the Principle of Superposition. That might lead you to the answer, pal! :)
 
Let d represent the distance between the two charges, and let x represent the distance to the right of the 2 μC charge at which the field is zero. In terms of x and d, how for is the -7 μC charge from the point where the field is zero? You will be solving for x in terms of d.
 
tiny-tim said:
hi rnjscksdyd! welcome to pf! :smile:correct :smile:no, it isn't the same r, is it? :wink:
I thought 'r' was a distance between the two charges. So, 'r' should be different in that, say, 'r1' is the distance between -7μC and the point where electric field strength is 0 and 'r2' is the distance between +2μC and the point where electric field strength is 0, right??

phyneach said:
Try and us the Principle of Superposition. That might lead you to the answer, pal! :)

Could you explain further please :( I thought superposition was for the waves, like constructive and destructive interference :( how do i apply this concept in electric field?

Chestermiller said:
Let d represent the distance between the two charges, and let x represent the distance to the right of the 2 μC charge at which the field is zero. In terms of x and d, how for is the -7 μC charge from the point where the field is zero? You will be solving for x in terms of d.

would that mean:
-7μC/(d+x) = +2μC/(x) ?

If it is so, how do I know that the answer is D? From the above equation I got:
-7μC/(d+x) = +2μC/(x)
-7μCx = +2μC(d+x)
x = -2d/9

Also, how do I know that 'x' is the distance to the right of +2μC supposing I did not know the answer?

Sorry I'm just bad at physics :(
 
rnjscksdyd said:
would that mean:
-7μC/(d+x) = +2μC/(x) ?

That's not the equation I get. If I do a force balance on a test charge, I get:

2μC/(x)2=+7μC/(d+x)2

Note the squares in the denominators. Next, take the square root of both sides of the equation.

Also, how do I know that 'x' is the distance to the right of +2μC supposing I did not know the answer?

Sorry I'm just bad at physics :(

It doesn't matter. The algebra would take care of that anyway.

Chet
 
tiny-tim said:
hi rnjscksdyd! welcome to pf! :smile:


correct :smile:


no, it isn't the same r, is it? :wink:

phyneach said:
Try and us the Principle of Superposition. That might lead you to the answer, pal! :)

Chestermiller said:
Let d represent the distance between the two charges, and let x represent the distance to the right of the 2 μC charge at which the field is zero. In terms of x and d, how for is the -7 μC charge from the point where the field is zero? You will be solving for x in terms of d.

Chestermiller said:
That's not the equation I get. If I do a force balance on a test charge, I get:

2μC/(x)2=+7μC/(d+x)2

Note the squares in the denominators. Next, take the square root of both sides of the equation.



It doesn't matter. The algebra would take care of that anyway.

Chet

Sorry, forgot about the squares :D
Then, is this right?
[tex]\frac{-7μC}{(d+x)^2}= \frac{+2μC}{x^2}[/tex]
[tex]-7μCx^2 = +2μC(d+x)^2[/tex]
[tex]-7μCx^2 = +2μC(d^2 + 2dx + x^2)[/tex]
[tex]-7x^2 = 2d^2 + 4dx + 2x^2[/tex]
I took out μC for now (it looks better :D)
[tex]0 = 9x^2 + 4dx + 2d^2[/tex]

[itex]x=\frac{-4d \pm \sqrt{16d^2 - 72d^2}}{18}[/itex]

but then I get a complex number since I get negative square root. Where did I go wrong?
 
hi rnjscksdyd! :smile:

(just got up :zzz:)
rnjscksdyd said:
I took out μC for now (it looks better :D)

it does! … and you could have taken it out from the start :wink:
[itex]x=\frac{-4d \pm \sqrt{16d^2 - 72d^2}}{18}[/itex]

but then I get a complex number since I get negative square root. Where did I go wrong?

your work (and result) is perfect except

can you think of a situation in which it isn't (d + x) ? :smile:
 
rnjscksdyd said:
Sorry, forgot about the squares :D
Then, is this right?
[tex]\frac{-7μC}{(d+x)^2}= \frac{+2μC}{x^2}[/tex]
[tex]-7μCx^2 = +2μC(d+x)^2[/tex]
[tex]-7μCx^2 = +2μC(d^2 + 2dx + x^2)[/tex]
[tex]-7x^2 = 2d^2 + 4dx + 2x^2[/tex]
I took out μC for now (it looks better :D)
[tex]0 = 9x^2 + 4dx + 2d^2[/tex]

[itex]x=\frac{-4d \pm \sqrt{16d^2 - 72d^2}}{18}[/itex]

but then I get a complex number since I get negative square root. Where did I go wrong?
You still have that minus sign in front of the 7, which is incorrect. It should be a + sign.
[tex]\frac{7μC}{(d+x)^2}= \frac{+2μC}{x^2}[/tex]
Taking the square root of both sides:
[tex]\frac{(d+x)}{x}=\sqrt{3.5}[/tex]
 
  • #10
Sorry for late reply, my internet was down -_-;; this country :(
tiny-tim said:
hi rnjscksdyd! :smile:

(just got up :zzz:)


it does! … and you could have taken it out from the start :wink:


your work (and result) is perfect except

can you think of a situation in which it isn't (d + x) ? :smile:


:( what do you mean when it isn't (d+x)?

Chestermiller said:
You still have that minus sign in front of the 7, which is incorrect. It should be a + sign.
[tex]\frac{7μC}{(d+x)^2}= \frac{+2μC}{x^2}[/tex]
Taking the square root of both sides:
[tex]\frac{(d+x)}{x}=\sqrt{3.5}[/tex]

Does that mean... when that value is negative, the field will be 0 on the left side and on the right if the value is positive?
 
  • #11
hi rnjscksdyd! :smile:
rnjscksdyd said:
:( what do you mean when it isn't (d+x)?

if it's d+x on the left, isn't it d-x on the right? :wink:
 
  • #12
Could you explain further please :( I thought superposition was for the waves, like constructive and destructive interference :( how do i apply this concept in electric field?

'According to this principle the total amount of force on a given particle is the vector sum of the individual forces applied on that charged particle by all the other charged particles. The individual forces of the particles is calculated using the formula of Coulombs law and is not influenced by the presence of other particles.'

Basically, Find the Coulomb's Force acting on each particle, one at a time, and then add it vectorially.
(Rememeber, DO NOT FORGET THE SIGN OF THE CHARGE OF THE PARTICLE!)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K