Electric Potential Energy of a sphere

AI Thread Summary
The problem involves calculating the work required to move a test charge of +1.0x10^-6 C from 100 m to 40 cm away from a charged sphere of 3.2x10^-3 C. The electric potential energy at both distances is calculated, resulting in values of 72 J at 40 cm and 0.288 J at 100 m. The work done is determined to be 71.7 J, which is rounded to 72 J for significant figures. There is a discussion about the direction of work done by the electric field and the external force, clarifying that moving the charge closer requires positive work by the external force. The participants confirm the correct interpretation of the problem after some initial confusion regarding the distances involved.
mrxtothaz
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A test charge of +1.0x10^-6 C is 40cm from a charged sphere of 3.2x10^-3 C. How much work was required to move it there from a point 1.0x10^2 m away from the sphere?

Homework Equations



W = \DeltaE
W = Ee2 - Ee1

The Attempt at a Solution



Ee2 = (9.0x10^9)(1.0x10^-6)(3.2x10^-3)/(0.4)
= 72

Ee1 = (9.0x10^9)(1.0x10^-6)(3.2x10^-3)/(100)
=0.288

W = 72 - 0.288
= 71.7
= 72 (significant digits)

I'm pretty sure my approach is correct, but I'm not sure if I should reverse the distance variables, since I would imagine it takes negative work to bring two like charges closer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In this case work done by the electric field is negative. But the work done by the external force is positive.
 
rl.bhat said:
In this case work done by the electric field is negative. But the work done by the external force is positive.

I think it's the other way around. Since there is no sign in front of the charge on the sphere, we must assume it is positive and the electric field generated by it must be radially out. This is also the direction of the (repulsive) electric force on the positive test charge. If the charge moves out from 40 cm to 100 m, the work done by the electric force is positive because the force doing the work and the displacement are in the same direction.
 
kuruman said:
I think it's the other way around. Since there is no sign in front of the charge on the sphere, we must assume it is positive and the electric field generated by it must be radially out. This is also the direction of the (repulsive) electric force on the positive test charge. If the charge moves out from 40 cm to 100 m, the work done by the electric force is positive because the force doing the work and the displacement are in the same direction.
In this problem charge is moved from 100 cm to 40 cm.
 
rl.bhat said:
In this problem charge is moved from 100 cm to 40 cm.
Yes, of course. I misread the problem.
 
I got the same answer that was posted.

To clarify the distance, the test charged is moved from a position 100 m away from the charged sphere to a position 40 cm away from the charged sphere.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top