Electric potential of 3 point charges

benchwarmer08
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Three point charges, which initially are infinitely far apart, are placed at the corners of an equilateral triangle with sides "b". Two of the point charges are identical and have charge "q".

If zero net work is required to place the three charges at the corners of the triangle, what must the value of the third charge be?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I know the electric potential at infinity is zero, but I'm not sure how to start this
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't forget about conservation of energy, The final potential energy between each of the charges is the some of the potential energy between them,

You are given this information:
1:Three charges are set up in a triangle
2:Two of the charges have charge q
3:The net potential is ZERO

what does super position say?
the sum of the charge is,

q1+q2+q3=0

what happens to that equation when q1 and q2 are the same?

solve that for q3, the charge on the other charge
 
What vorcil originally said is correct. The final potential energy is the sum of the potential energy between each pair of charges. But that isn't the same as the sum of the charges (not sure where that came from).

I suggest first writing out the potential energy equation and showing some work benchwarmer. And we can help you from there.
 
I figured it out guys, thanks
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top