Electric potential PRoblem , dont understand

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric potential from two fixed charges, q1 = +7e and q2 = -15e, separated by 23.9 cm. The user seeks clarification on why the net electric potential is zero at a point between the charges for positive values and to the left for negative values. It is emphasized that understanding the electric potential from a single point charge is crucial before addressing the combined potential from multiple charges. The conversation suggests researching the electric potential surrounding a point charge to gain a foundational understanding. Mastering these concepts is essential for solving the given problem effectively.
th3plan
Messages
93
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In the picture i attached, particles with charges q1 = +7e and q2 = -15e are fixed in place with a separation of d = 23.9 cm. With V = 0 at infinity, what are the finite (a) positive and (b) negative values of x (in cm) at which the net electric potential on the x-axis is zero?



I don't understand why for positive net electric potential is in the middle between them, and negative is to the left. Can someone explain this.
 

Attachments

  • fig24_32.gif
    fig24_32.gif
    941 bytes · Views: 556
Physics news on Phys.org
For each of the three regions (x < 0, 0 < x < d, x > d), write an expression that describes the net potential as a function of position.

What's the electric potential surrounding a point charge?
 
How would i do that, my book doesn't require us to write functions. I don't know what the electric potential surround a point charge is
 
th3plan said:
How would i do that, my book doesn't require us to write functions.
By "function" I just mean a mathematical formula.
I don't know what the electric potential surround a point charge is
There's no point in worrying about the potential from two charges until you understand how to find the potential from one charge. Look it up!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top