Electric potential reference points confusion

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the evaluation of electric potential for a solid sphere using two integrals. The first integral, with volume V1 = 4πr³/3, calculates potential from infinity to the sphere's surface at radius R. The second integral, with volume V2 = 4πR³/3, computes potential from the surface to any point r within the sphere. The distinction lies in the reference point for integration, where V1 accounts for the volume outside the sphere and V2 represents the constant volume at the surface.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric potential and its mathematical representation
  • Familiarity with spherical coordinates and integration techniques
  • Knowledge of solid sphere properties in electrostatics
  • Basic grasp of calculus, particularly multiple integrals
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of electric potential for different geometries, focusing on solid spheres
  • Learn about the application of Gauss's Law in electrostatics
  • Explore the concept of reference points in potential energy calculations
  • Investigate the implications of varying integration limits in potential calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those specializing in electrostatics, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to electric potential in solid spheres.

Shinobii
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Hi gang, I am hoping you can clear something up for me. When evaluating the potential of a solid sphere, I find myself confused about the volumes used such that,

\phi = Q \int_{\infty}^R \frac{1}{V_1} r^2 \sin(\theta) \, dr \, d\theta \, d\phi + Q \int_R^r \frac{1}{V_2} r^2 \sin(\theta) \, dr \, d\theta \, d\phi.

where V_1 = 4 \pi r^3/3 and V_2 = 4 \pi R^3/3.

Why is V_1 the volume inside and V_2 the volume at r = R?

The first volume I understand since we are coming from infinity to the surface of the sphere. But when evaluating the second integral with the second volume, why is it only at r=R.

My current logic is that the volume depends on the initial point of integration (which would be consistent with this problem), but surely this cannot be always true?

I hope someone can shed some light on this matter.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Shinobii said:
Hi gang, I am hoping you can clear something up for me. When evaluating the potential of a solid sphere, I find myself confused about the volumes used such that,

\phi = Q \int_{\infty}^R \frac{1}{V_1} r^2 \sin(\theta) \, dr \, d\theta \, d\phi + Q \int_R^r \frac{1}{V_2} r^2 \sin(\theta) \, dr \, d\theta \, d\phi.

where V_1 = 4 \pi r^3/3 and V_2 = 4 \pi R^3/3.

Why is V_1 the volume inside and V_2 the volume at r = R?

The first volume I understand since we are coming from infinity to the surface of the sphere. But when evaluating the second integral with the second volume, why is it only at r=R.

My current logic is that the volume depends on the initial point of integration (which would be consistent with this problem), but surely this cannot be always true?

I hope someone can shed some light on this matter.

I don't think I've seen whatever formula you're using, but I think you're attempting to find the potential inside the sphere. You start from zero since that's you're reference point and integrate up to the surface of the sphere. Then you add another integral since the term you're integrating is different inside the sphere. This runs from the surface to whatever point you want to find the potential at, r.

Is your question why you go to r and not 0? That's because that would give you the potential at the center. r gives you the ability to plug in any distance from the center inside the sphere and find the potential.
 
Thanks

Yes, you are right about the potential inside a solid sphere; sorry for not being more clear. You answered my question perfectly! I suppose that is also the reason that V_1 has r in the denominator, since we are coming in from infinity.

Thanks a bunch.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
743
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K