Electric Potential: x,y,z Components & Zero Points

sbe07phy
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



a) In a certain region of space, the electric potential is V(x,y,z) = Axy - Bx^5 + Cy where A, B, and C are positive constants. Calculate the x, y , and z components of the electric field. Use A, B, C, x, y, and z as necessary
b) At which points is the electric field equal to zero.

Any help?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
What can't you do? It's hard to help if you don't say what's actually holding you back. Do you know how to calculate the electric field from the potential?
 
How to get started. Do I just solve for each variable with that equation?
 
The equation for getting the electric field from the potential is \mathbf{E} = \boldsymbol{\nabla}V. Did you already know that?
 
Allow me to expand on what genneth started..

he is correct...E= - Del V
where del is the gradiate operator.
You have V in cartesian.

so del V = x(hat)*dV/dx+y(hat)*dV/dy+z(hat)*dV/dz
You textbook should give the relationship for del V, don't forget the negative sign.

So take the derivate of V with respect to x, then repeat for y and z.

This should get you going. If I am wrong, I apologize, but that is how I did a similar problem in my homework.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top