Electric Power: P=VI Explained

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between power, voltage, and current, articulated through the formula P = VI. It explores how power remains constant despite variations in voltage and current, emphasizing that high voltage with low current can equate to the same power as low voltage with high current, due to resistance factors. Participants clarify that the work done in moving electrons is influenced by resistance, which affects the energy required to move a charge. Analogies involving lifting stones and building pyramids illustrate the concept of work and power in both electrical and mechanical contexts. Ultimately, the consensus is that power remains equal in both scenarios despite differences in voltage, current, and resistance.
freeload
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I know that P = VI where P is power in watts (joule/second), V is voltage in volts (joule/coulomb), I is electric current in amps (coulomb/second).

My idea of work is like this. I use force (in Newton) to pick up a stone and take it from point A to point B with a distance d in meters. I think that's work in joule (Work = Force x distance). If I would apply this to electricity, the stone pertains to an electron.

My idea about power is, say I did what I did above in 1 second. Thus Power is equal to joule/second.

Now my question is this. Say that the pressure (Voltage) is 120 V and the flow 10 Amps is less (electric current). That means I have 1200 Watts of power. What if I switch values as in 10 V, 120 Amps. This clearly states that the pressure (Voltage) now is less while the flow (electric current) is much. Now my question is this. In the situation where the pressure is high and current is low, shouldn't the power be less? And in the situation where the pressure is low and the current is high, shouldn't the power be much?

I appreciate your ideas.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The concept is clearer if you don't compare power in the electric instance to work in the mechanical one. If you think about the work done in moving a charge from one potential to another, it's W = qV. So, just as you get the same work if you lift one stone two meters or two stones one meter, you get the same work if you move one Coulomb two Volts or two Coulombs one Volt. Very similar to the mechanical case.

Power has to do with how fast you do the total work. You can use 10 W of power to do a billion Joules of work, just not very quickly. But, to compare work and power is something akin to comparing distance and speed - they can only be compared under very specific conditions.
 
The answer to your question is no, power would be equal. I think you are leaving out the concept of resistance in your reasoning.

freeload said:
Now my question is this. Say that the pressure (Voltage) is 120 V and the flow 10 Amps is less (electric current). That means I have 1200 Watts of power. What if I switch values as in 10 V, 120 Amps.
QUOTE]

When you say the V=120V and I=10A, you know by definition that R=12ohms. When switch, R= 83mohms. So,
in the first case (1):
you are moving less electrons (10A vs. 120A) through high resistivity (12ohms vs. 83mOhms) by use of a high voltage presure.

in the second case(2):
you are moving more electrons (120A) through less resistivity (83mOhms) by use of a lower voltage.

In your stone carrying experimet, it would be like:
well, exactly as the person above describes. More stones less travel vs. less stones more travel. The same work would be completed. You could also use the analogy "same number of stones, but different levels of water (say 2 ft and 5 ft) that the person must walk through to carry the stone different distances (say 1m for the 5 ft and 10m for the 2ft).

if you are still unclear on this, do the following. Pose the exact same question, but this time in terms of resistance and voltage; then do it again in terms of resistance and current. Then you will have all three interpretations only two of which are really needed, but the three together give different view points of the same problem. One thing I learned early on is to view a problem or concept from as many angles as possible.
 
gunslingor, thanks for the help. And you TVP45. I really appreciate your help.

After reading gunslingor's comment on this, the way I understand it is like this. In the first situation where there are more voltage, low current, and high resistance, the work needed to move 1 coulomb of electron is so much greater because of high resistance than moving 1 coulomb of electron in the second situation where there is low resistance. So basically the work done in the two situations in a second is equal although there are few electrons which are moved in the first situation than in the second situation because of their difference in the level of resistance.
 
Pretty much. let me modify as follows:

After reading gunslingor's comment on this, the way I understand it is like this. In the first situation where there is a stronger voltage, low current, and high resistance, the work needed to move 1 coulomb of electron is so much greater because of high resistance than moving 1 coulomb of electron in the second situation where there is low resistance; but since the voltage is higher in this case, the same work is performed. So basically the work done in the two situations in a second is equal although there are few electrons which are moved in the first situation than in the second situation because of their difference in the level of resistance and voltage levels.

One more example. Imagin I am building the great pyramids. starting on level one, I need a lot of blocks. On level two I need less blocks, but have to move them higher. And so on, until you only have to move one block at the top level, but it is very very high. Therefore, in conceptual theory, the total power to produce the pyrimad remains constant throughout the process even though the number of blocks changes (electrons, i.e. current) since the hieght (resistance) changes inversely to the number of blocks and the work potential (height per block or resistance times current) changes proportionally to the numeber of blocks (or inversely to to amount of current.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top