Electric Sulfur Balls: Otto von Guericke’s Discovery

AI Thread Summary
Otto von Guericke conducted the first systematic study of static electricity using sulfur balls, which he created by pouring molten sulfur into hollow glass globes. The choice of sulfur stemmed from its efficient electrifying properties, as it can easily build up a negative charge when rubbed, unlike glass, which carries a positive charge. Historical references indicate that sulfur was recognized for its electrifying capabilities as far back as ancient times, with Aristotle mentioning it alongside amber. This experimentation with various materials led to the discovery that sulfur was one of the most effective for generating static electricity. The discussion highlights the significance of sulfur in early electrical studies and its historical context.
eudo
Messages
28
Reaction score
7
I've heard many times of the first systematic study of static electricity: Otto von Guericke would spin a ball made of sulfur and rub it by hand, building up an electric charge. To make a sulfur ball, he would pour molten sulfur into a hollow glass globe, wait for the sulfur to harden, then break the glass container. Ironically, he could have done away with the sulfur and just used the glass ball instead! In fact years later that's just what other scientists did.

So the question is, why sulfur? Where did he get it in his head that sulfur had these properties? It seems a weird thing to me to use. He must have heard someone else mention that sulfur gave off electric sparks if you rubbed it enough or something, right? Anyone know the story?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sulfur is much easier to electrify it than glass. And electrifies differently: sulfur recives negative charge, while glass positive.
Von Guericke and others at his times just tested lots of materials, sulfur occurred to be among the most efficient electrifiers.

Actually sulfur was one of few materials having 'electrifying' properties discovered already in ancient times.

(Disclaimer: I must check it, 90% sure) Aristotle mentioned sulfur along with amber.
 
Thread 'Inducing EMF Through a Coil: Understanding Flux'
Thank you for reading my post. I can understand why a change in magnetic flux through a conducting surface would induce an emf, but how does this work when inducing an emf through a coil? How does the flux through the empty space between the wires have an effect on the electrons in the wire itself? In the image below is a coil with a magnetic field going through the space between the wires but not necessarily through the wires themselves. Thank you.
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (Second part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8. I want to understand some issues more correctly. It's a little bit difficult to understand now. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. In the page 196, in the first paragraph, the author argues as follows ...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
8K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Back
Top