Electrical energy = electricity?

AI Thread Summary
Electrical energy and electricity are not the same; electrical energy refers specifically to the energy associated with the flow of charged particles, while electricity encompasses a broader range of phenomena related to electric charges. Common usage often blurs the lines between these terms, leading to confusion, especially since "electricity" is frequently used in everyday contexts to describe various electrical concepts. Scientific definitions clarify that electricity includes effects from both stationary and moving charges, whereas electrical energy is a specific form of energy. It is important to differentiate between these terms in scientific discussions to avoid ambiguity. Understanding this distinction is crucial for accurate communication in both academic and practical applications.
xunxine
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
Many texts I've come across use "electrical energy" and "electricity" interchangeably. Some online dictionaries also state "electricity" and "electrical energy" as synonyms. Are they really the same?

In the topic called energy, my friend wrote "Electrical energy is the energy possessed by electricity". I pointed out that this definition is not accurate, that it should be "Electrical energy is the energy due to the flow of charged particles". Which is correct (if any)?

A check with an oxford dictionary that i have:
Electrical energy: a form of energy related to the position of an electric charge in an electric field
Electricity: any effect resulting from the existence of stationary or moving electric charges.

Now I'm even more confused! Pls help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Most lamen equate electicity to energy or power (energy per time) because that's how we use it in our every day lives.

From a scientific view, wegenerally mean the whole phenomon of electricity, of which energy is just one aspect.
 
Wisely, I think, 'they' don't really define Electricity, except as a word to describe the general topic.

You often hear expressions like "electricity going through wires" so it is sometimes taken to mean Current.
Steer clear!
 
i know in everyday use or stating the topic, "electricity" is used.
but in science & studies, don't we need to differentiate them? are they the same?
 
xunxine said:
i know in everyday use or stating the topic, "electricity" is used.
but in science & studies, don't we need to differentiate them? are they the same?

Yes, we need to differentiate them.
No, they are not the same.

As I said, "electricity" is the general phenomenon, though it's official name is "electrodynamics" or "electromagnetics" ever since it was united with magnetism. A measurement of energy from an electrical event is not called electricity.
 
Avoid the use of the word 'electricity' - except in the title of a section of a Science Syllabus or to describe some stuff you may buy to run your domestic appliances.
The word has no precise meaning (afaik) in Science so you can't be surprised when it seems to be used loosely.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top