Electricity in Space: Can It Work?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Twiz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electricity Space
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of generating electricity in space using a turbine powered by a rotating magnet. Participants explore the implications of reduced gravity and air resistance in a space environment compared to Earth.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that a turbine in space could generate electricity indefinitely with a single push due to the absence of gravity and air resistance.
  • Another participant counters that the primary energy loss in such a system would come from the energy required to rotate the magnet against the magnetic field, which would negate the benefits of reduced friction in space.
  • A later reply acknowledges the counterpoint regarding magnetism and expresses gratitude for the clarification.
  • One participant expresses discomfort with the assertion that there is no gravity in space, indicating a potential misunderstanding of gravitational effects in different contexts.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus, as there are competing views regarding the feasibility of the proposed electricity generation method in space and the role of gravity and friction.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights assumptions about energy loss mechanisms and the role of magnetism, which remain unresolved. The implications of gravity in space are also noted as a point of contention.

Twiz
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
First post here, hello!

Just wondering if I could get a second opinion on something. I'm doing my GCSEs right now, and after learning about the way electricity is generated, I had an idea, but I don't know if it's possible as I'm no expert.

Electricity is produced when you have a magnet rotating within a magnetic field right? We spend a lot of money making the magnets rotate, burning stuff usually to produce the power to turn them. Because of friction of gravity and air resistance and all of that, we have to keep using resources to make power. In space, there isn't gravity and there isn't air resistance. You can push something in space and it will keep on moving forever if it doesn't hit anything. Surely this means you could have a turbine in space, give it one push, and it would carry on turning forever(or until friction stops it)? Wouldn't this be a really cheap way of powering space stations.etc?

I'm guessing there's some flaw in my plan, as I would've heard about it before if it was pheasable, but I'm wondering what you think...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The flaw in your plan is that by far the largest source of energy loss is the energy required to rotate the magnet against a magnetic field! That's where the electrical energy comes from and the energy required is exactly equal to the energy generated.

Also, friction forces due to gravity are miniscule compared to the forces being applied to the generator, so internal friction won't change much if the generator were put in space.
 
Oh ok then, I get that, I hadn't taken the magnetism into consideration...

Thanks :-)
 
Twiz said:
In space, there isn't gravityQUOTE]

Anybody else cringe everytime you see this?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K