Electricity in Space: Can It Work?

AI Thread Summary
Electricity generation in space using a turbine may seem efficient due to the absence of gravity and air resistance, but the primary energy loss occurs from the energy needed to rotate magnets against a magnetic field. This energy requirement negates the benefits of reduced friction in a vacuum. Even in space, internal friction remains significant and does not drastically change the efficiency of the generator. The concept of perpetual motion in this context is flawed because the energy input equals the energy output. Overall, while the idea is intriguing, it does not provide a feasible solution for powering space stations.
Twiz
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
First post here, hello!

Just wondering if I could get a second opinion on something. I'm doing my GCSEs right now, and after learning about the way electricity is generated, I had an idea, but I don't know if it's possible as I'm no expert.

Electricity is produced when you have a magnet rotating within a magnetic field right? We spend a lot of money making the magnets rotate, burning stuff usually to produce the power to turn them. Because of friction of gravity and air resistance and all of that, we have to keep using resources to make power. In space, there isn't gravity and there isn't air resistance. You can push something in space and it will keep on moving forever if it doesn't hit anything. Surely this means you could have a turbine in space, give it one push, and it would carry on turning forever(or until friction stops it)? Wouldn't this be a really cheap way of powering space stations.etc?

I'm guessing there's some flaw in my plan, as I would've heard about it before if it was pheasable, but I'm wondering what you think...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The flaw in your plan is that by far the largest source of energy loss is the energy required to rotate the magnet against a magnetic field! That's where the electrical energy comes from and the energy required is exactly equal to the energy generated.

Also, friction forces due to gravity are miniscule compared to the forces being applied to the generator, so internal friction won't change much if the generator were put in space.
 
Oh ok then, I get that, I hadn't taken the magnetism into consideration...

Thanks :-)
 
Twiz said:
In space, there isn't gravityQUOTE]

Anybody else cringe everytime you see this?
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top