Electro-Conductivity Layer Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter T.Swede
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the total conductivity of multiple layers with different conductivity values, all of equal thickness and in intimate contact. The proposed formula for total conductivity, 1/sigmatotal = 1/sigma1 + 1/sigma2 + ..., is confirmed to be correct. This equation parallels the rules for resistors in parallel and capacitors in series, as conductivity is the inverse of resistance. The conversation also touches on the relationship between resistance and conductivity, emphasizing that they can be treated similarly in calculations. Overall, the participants agree on the validity of the approach to calculate total conductivity for layered materials.
T.Swede
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Given different conductivity values, sigma1, sigma2, etc.

Given the thicknesses are the same.

Given the layers are in intimate contact with each other. (No air gaps.)

Is the whole conductivity for the stackup of layers follow this:

1/sigmatotal = 1/sigma1 + 1/sigma2 + ... ?

Is this correct?

Is this the same equation as resistors in parallel, capacitors in series, conductors in thermo?

I don't know (more like I can't remember - E&M and thermo years ago) and would appreciate the help. Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No Takers?

T.Swede said:
Given different conductivity values, sigma1, sigma2, etc.

Given the thicknesses are the same.

Given the layers are in intimate contact with each other. (No air gaps.)

Is the whole conductivity for the stackup of layers follow this:

1/sigmatotal = 1/sigma1 + 1/sigma2 + ... ?

Is this correct?

Is this the same equation as resistors in parallel, capacitors in series, conductors in thermo?

I don't know (more like I can't remember - E&M and thermo years ago) and would appreciate the help. Thank you.

No physics majors? :smile: I'm not trying to trip anyone up. I am being sincere. Should I reword the question? How about this:

Take several metals of different conductivity, with the same thickness, intimately layered on each other. What is the total conductivity?

Should I try another forum? Anyone that I could ask would be appreciated? Thank you.
 
Hi there Swede. No physics major, but I hope my electronics major will do ^^. That seems correct. If you want to look at it from another view point. Consider that conductivity is the inverse of resistance, so...

conductivity = 1/resistance

And the resistance add up rule is:

Rtotal = R1 + R2 + R3 + ...

Then why not have the conductivity addup rule be:

1/Ctotal = 1/C1 + 1/C2 + 1/C3 + ... (since R1 = 1/C1, R2 = 1/C2 ...)

And yes, as far as I can remember, it is the same equation for capacitors and conductance in thermodynamics =D
 
Last edited:
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top