Electrochemical Cell | 75W Bulb | 50min | 12V Battery

AI Thread Summary
To determine the energy required to power a 75.0 W light bulb for 50 minutes using a 12.0 V battery, the calculation involves converting time into seconds and applying the power formula. The total time is 3000 seconds (50 minutes x 60 seconds). Since 1 watt equals 1 joule per second, the energy can be calculated as 75.0 J/s multiplied by 3000 seconds, resulting in 225,000 joules. The key is to ensure the seconds cancel out to isolate joules in the final calculation. This approach confirms that 225,000 joules are needed to keep the bulb burning for the specified duration.
nicolew12
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 75.0-W light bulb is powered by connecting it to a standard 12.0 V auto lead-storage battery. How much energy (J) is required to keep the bulb burning for 50.0 continuous minutes ?
Assume 100 percent efficency.

Homework Equations



1 watt = 1 J/s
1 J = 1 C x 1 V

The Attempt at a Solution



(50min/12v)(60second/min)(75J/second)

I am confused about how to get Joules by itself
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to Physics Forums.

Use the fact that 75.0 W is 75.0 J/s. If you can do something to cancel the s in 75.0 J/s, you will have the energy in Joules.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top