Electrode Potentials and Redox reactions

AI Thread Summary
Electrode potentials are crucial for understanding redox reactions, as they indicate the relative strength of a metal's reduction capability. The standard electrode potential of lithium is -3.05V, suggesting it is a strong reducing agent. The electrode potential for the reaction Li → Li⁺ + e⁻ is -3.05V, while the reverse reaction Li⁺ + e⁻ → Li would have a positive value of +3.05V. Reduction potentials indicate how likely an element is to be reduced, while oxidation potentials reflect its likelihood to be oxidized, with the two being mathematically related. Ultimately, the spontaneous direction of a reaction is determined by the sign of the electrode potential, which can flip depending on the reaction's direction.
hms.tech
Messages
246
Reaction score
0
What is the relation between Electrode Potentials and Redox reactions ?

Can we determine the relative strength of reduction of a metal by looking just at the electrode potentials ?

Here is a particular thing that confuses me :

We know that the standard electrode potential of Lithium is -3.05V

I know that this implies that the bulk of the following reaction is to the right . (ie Lithium is a very good reducing agent.

Li \longleftrightarrow Li^{+} + e^{-}


So here is the confusion :
1. What is the electrode potential of this reaction ?
Li \rightarrow Li^{+} + e^{-}

2.What is the electrode potential of this reaction ?
Li \leftarrow Li^{+} + e^{-}

are these going to be exactly the same as -3.05V or would we see a sign flip ?

Also, what exactly is a reduction potential and an oxidation potential ? (is there a difference between the two) ?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
The reduction half reaction would be the negative one, and the oxidation half reaction would have the same magnitude as the standard reduction potential of lithium, but opposite in sign (so in short, positive). The values for the standard potential are usually listed in a table called standard reduction potential table, which I'm assuming you know. Those values are for the reduction reaction. The reverse of the reaction (the oxidation) has the cell potential opposite to the sign of the reaction cell potential of the other reaction.

The standard reduction potential values are from an experiment made with a voltaic cell, with the other electrode being SHE (Standard Hydrogen Electrode). The value for H+ is assigned with a value of 0 V arbitrarily. The reduction potential, as its name suggests, gives you an idea how that particular element is more likely to be reduced. And the oxidation potential gives you an idea how that particular element is more likely to be oxidized. If the value for the reduction potential is positive, then it is spontaneous (meaning this occurs in nature). If it is negative, then it isn't likely to occur.

As you may see from your equation, oxidation and reduction is seen by the forward and reverse equations. This means that one will have the positive value, and the other one having a negative value. Only one direction will be favored and be spontaneous.
 
Last edited:
This is a misleading approach.

Reaction goes both ways at exactly the same potential, doesn't matter if it is oxidation or reduction. When we want to calculate cell potential difference we should subtract EOx from ERed - and the sign will "flip itself" whenever necessary, this is simple math.

When calculating temperature difference between two objects of which one is at 10°C and the other at -10°C, we subtract 10-(-10)=20. Sure, we can say one has a "positive temperature" of 10°C and the other has "negative temperature" of 10°C, and the difference is sum of these - but it is just making things confusing when they are not.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top