Electrodynamics (Lorentz to Faraday)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around deriving the work done on a unit charge when pulling a wire through a magnetic field (B-field) using the Lorentz force. In the first part, the user attempts to define the force per unit charge and questions the need for a negative sign in their calculations. In the second part, they explore vertical and horizontal work components but realize they are off by a factor of √2 in their final expression for work. The user acknowledges a mistake related to the relationship between the velocities u and v, which they clarify after further reflection. The conversation highlights the complexities of applying classical electrodynamics principles to practical scenarios.
iScience
Messages
466
Reaction score
5
Electrodynamics (Lorentz Force & Voltage) [edited]

Two part inquiry


PART I


Situation: I have a B-field and I'm pulling a straight piece of wire through that B-field


kjYe0tL.png


You pull the wire perpendicularly through the B-field at velocity v; charges between points a and b will experience the Lorentz Force and will begin to move along the wire with velocity u, and thus will experience a force opposite to the direction which you are pulling the wire.



Goal: Trying to derive the work done on a unit charge the classical way (by integrating along the path it takes)


Let us define the force per unit q to pull the wire through the field: f(pull)\equivuB


$$\int f_{pull} \cdot dl = (uB) \frac{y}{cosθ}sinθ= vBhy$$



Problem: The vector f(pull) should be pointing outward (opposite the direction of wire pulling). so then shouldn't there be a negative sign somewhere?

--------------------


PART II


I decided to try and derive it my own way and i ran into a problem somewhere but i can't seem to spot where it is.


I said that, there is a vertical work component and a horizontal work component.

vertical work component

(From the initial pull)

$$W_y= \int (q\vec{v} \times \vec{B}) \cdot dy = (qvB)y= qvBy$$


horizontal work component

$$W_x= \int (q\vec{u} \times \vec{B}) \cdot dx = quBx =quBytanθ$$


vectorial sum

(yes i know work is a scalar quantity. but there is a work in x direction and work in the y direction so i thought i'd try this approach)

$$W= \sqrt{(qvBy)^2+(quBytanθ)2}= qBy\sqrt{v^2+u^2tan^2θ}$$

but since utanθ=v

$$W=qBy\sqrt{2v^2}=\sqrt{2}qvBy$$

i'm off by a factor of \sqrt{2}


Could someone please help me find the mistake in doing it this way?


help is much appreciated. ty all!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Notice that on the left hand side is ##u\tan(\theta)## and on the right hand side is ##v##. So it must be that ##u\tan(\theta)=v##. Look at figure 7.11 to see why this might be
 
Matterwave said:
Notice that on the left hand side is ##u\tan(\theta)## and on the right hand side is ##v##. So it must be that ##u\tan(\theta)=v##. Look at figure 7.11 to see why this might be


yeah i actually caught that right after i posted it. I'm actually now stuck with a different set of questions.

but thanks!
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...

Similar threads

Back
Top