Electrolysis in Cu/Hg electrolytic cell

  • Thread starter Thread starter steven10137
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cell Electrolysis
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the ratio of moles of copper to mercury deposited in an electrolytic cell. The relevant species involved include Cu²⁺ ions and Hg₂²⁺ ions. At the cathode, copper is deposited from Cu²⁺ ions, while at the anode, Hg₂²⁺ ions are oxidized to Hg²⁺ ions. There is confusion regarding whether the Hg²⁺ ions are further reduced to liquid mercury. The participant seeks clarification on the electrolysis process and the rules governing the reactions involved.
steven10137
Messages
117
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



http://img143.imageshack.us/img143/7135/electrolysisrf2.jpg

What is the ratio of number of moles of copper deposited to the number of moles of mercury deposited? {n(Cu):n(Hg)}

2. The attempt at a solution

Well the species present are;
<br /> \begin{array}{l}<br /> Cu^{2 + } /SO_4 ^{2 - } \;ions \\ <br /> Hg_2 ^{2 + } /NO_3 ^ - \;ions \\ <br /> and\;H_2 O \\ <br /> \end{array}<br />

so reading down the Eo table from left to right; the first species found is Cu^{2 + } ions.
So at the cathode we have; Cu^{2 + } + 2e^ - \to Cu

Now reading up the Eo table from right to left; the first species found is Hg_2 ^{2 + }
So I would assume that at the anode we have; Hg_2 ^{2 + } \to 2Hg^{2 + } + 2e^ -

Now the question states that it is the ratio of copper to mercury produced. How can this be?
Do I just assume that the mercury ions are now further electrolysed to mercury by;
Hg^{2 + } + 2e^ - \to Hg_{(l)}

Could someone please explain how this works and what rules I am supposed to be following as I am a little confused ...

cheers
Steven
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Anybody

- sorry I have an exam Friday :(
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top