Electromagnet lifting capability increasing unexpectedly

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the unexpected lifting capabilities of DC electromagnets in an experimental setup, focusing on how variations in current, number of turns, and core length affect performance. Participants explore theoretical predictions versus actual results, examining the complexities involved in electromagnet behavior.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant reports experimental results that significantly exceed theoretical predictions based on the formula F=N²I²μ²A/2μ₀L², leading to questions about potential missing factors in the setup.
  • Another participant suggests that nearby magnetic materials might distort the magnetic field, affecting the results.
  • Concerns are raised about the complexity of the magnetic field path and its interaction with the mass being lifted, indicating that this might complicate the understanding of magnetic flux.
  • There is a discussion about the appropriateness of the formula used, with one participant noting that it may only apply to closed magnetic circuits, prompting questions about alternative equations for the participant's specific setup.
  • A participant offers to help derive a more suitable equation if additional information, such as the core's cross-sectional area, is provided.
  • Another participant mentions the nonlinear nature of the equations involved, emphasizing the variability of the core's permeability with the magnetic field, which complicates the analysis.
  • One participant expresses relief at finding a simpler formula that seems reliable for their purposes, indicating a shift in their understanding.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the reasons for the discrepancies between theoretical and experimental results. Multiple competing views and hypotheses are presented, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include potential missing assumptions regarding the experimental setup, the dependence on the definitions of magnetic circuits, and unresolved mathematical complexities related to the nonlinear behavior of magnetic materials.

aloman
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hello,
I have been performing an experiment in which I am observing the lifting capacity of DC electromagnets while changing variables including current, number of turns, and length of the core. It is a fairly basic experiment as all the theoretical values can be obtained using the formula F=N2I2μ2A/2μ0L2

However I am getting results that do not satisfy this equation and I am not sure why this may be.
Testing an electromagnet with a carbon steel core of length 6.5cm and 77 turns in the solenoid with currents of 5.04 A , 3.77 A and, 2.51 A I get average maximum lifting mass results of 0.7447 kg, 0.4179 kg, and 0.1875 kg respectively. However when I test the magnet with a core length of 12.25cm, 154 turns and the same currents, (which according to the theory should yield results of 1.126 times that of the first magnet) I get the following results of 1.7027 kg, 0.8407 kg, and 0.4036 kg respectively. The results of the second magnet are approximately two times greater than they should be according to the first magnet and the theory.

Could it be that I am missing something obvious, and if so what? Any input would be valued.
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
If there are other magnetic materials nearby, they may distort the field differently because the other pole is in a different position, depending on the length of your test core.
 
I don't think the effects would be so extreme if that were the only reason. I am thinking it could be caused by the mass I'm lifting and its addition to the length of the system. If this is the cause than there is far to much complexity in the field path for my ability level and understanding of magnetic flux to make any creditable claims. Though Believe if I were to change my setup so the magnet was only ever in contact with a piece metal that remains constant and a variable non-magnetic mass suspended from the constant piece.

as follows:
Screen Shot 2014-01-18 at 8.16.36 PM.png
 
Last edited:
aloman said:
I don't think the effects would be so extreme if that were the only reason. I am thinking it could be caused by the mass I'm lifting and its addition to the length of the system. If this is the cause than there is far to much complexity in the field path for my ability level and understanding of magnetic flux to make any creditable claims. Though Believe if I were to change my setup so the magnet was only ever in contact with a piece metal that remains constant and a variable non-magnetic mass suspended from the constant piece.

as follows:
View attachment 65793


It looks as though you've used the wrong equation. According to wiki, that equation is good for a horseshoe type magnet:

Closed magnetic circuit
...
For a closed magnetic circuit (no air gap), such as would be found in an electromagnet lifting a piece of iron bridged across its poles, equation becomes: F=N2I2μ2A/2μ0L2
Bolding mine
 
That is true, I have an "i" magnet. What equation would I use then?
 
aloman said:
That is true, I have an "i" magnet. What equation would I use then?

I'm not sure. I've been working on your problem on and off since you first posted, and the only answer I have is; "It's complicated".

I've never experimented with electromagnets, nor have I studied them since university, 30 years ago.

It might be possible for us to derive an equation for your system, if you were to provide us with the cross sectional area of your core.
 
the cross-sectional area is 1.2668x10-4 m

I have also been wondering how direct the relationship between the magnetic force and lifting capacity is, If a electromagnetic force of 16 N is able to lift approximately 1.63 kg of steel then it becomes possible to estimate the relative permeability of my core.
 
aloman said:
It does seem rather complicated.
http://www.goudsmit-magnetics.nl/EN/Background-information/About-magnetic-lifting

I believe that the lift capacity of my set-up would be about 90-95% of the lifting force.

I was about to give up, but I ran across the equation for the pull force of a single magnet:

m=(B2A)/(2μogn)

From which you can derive "k", and subsequently μ, for the first phase of your experiment.

The following statement tells me that this is not a "plug and chug" problem, and is therefore not within my abilities to solve:

This is a nonlinear equation, because the permeability of the core, μ, varies with the magnetic field B. For an exact solution, the value of μ at the B value used must be obtained from the core material hysteresis curve.
ref

Hysteresis curves always hurt my brain, as I recall.

And this:

in magnetic circuits with an air gap, the strength of the magnetic field B depends strongly on the length of the air gap, and the length of the flux path in the core doesn't matter much.

indicates that although you doubled the length of your core, it really didn't matter.
 
  • #10
Thank you very much I think I have a fairly reliable approximation now. I was able to get a formula that seems simple enough.
lucky for me I'm not planing on going into electrical engineering.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
12K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K