Electromagnet with and without airgap.

  • Thread starter Thread starter center o bass
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electromagnet
AI Thread Summary
Electromagnets with an airgap experience a significant reduction in magnetic field strength compared to those without, due to the introduction of magnetic reluctance. The core material enhances the magnetic field by aligning internal dipoles, akin to a short circuit in an electrical circuit that allows high current flow. When an airgap is introduced, it acts as a resistance, leading to a dramatic decrease in the effective magnetic field. Understanding this phenomenon requires differentiating between Magnetic Flux Density (B) and Magnetic Field Strength (H), as they behave differently inside and outside the core. For a deeper explanation, further reading on magnetic fields is recommended.
center o bass
Messages
545
Reaction score
2
Hello! I'm a bit confused by a phenomenon regarding electromagnets with and without airgaps.

A picture of the kind of electromagnet i have in mind is found here:

http://sci-toys.com/scitoys/scitoys/magnets/calculating/calculating.html

If one has a "loopy" electromagnet without an airgap, the effect of the material will be to boost the magnetic field strength by a certain factor and guide the fieldlines trough the material. This is because the initial field will tend to align the magnetic dipoles inside the material which in turn will create a bigger "current" inside the material.. the current being the source of the magnetic field.

But if one now introduces a little tiny airgap the fieldstrength goes down dramatically.

In the picture of magnetic dipoles, induced volumecurrents and surface currents, what is the physical explanation of this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
center o bass said:
... if one now introduces a little tiny airgap the fieldstrength goes down dramatically...what is the physical explanation of this?

The easy answer:

By analogy with an electrical circuit.. If you connect a voltage source to a short-circuit then a large electric current flows. If you then introduce a small resistance in the circuit the electrical current goes down dramatically.
The iron core of a toroidal (donut with a hole) electromagnet is equivalent to a magnetic "short circuit". The tiny airgap is equivalent to a magnetic resistance ("magnetic reluctance" is the correct term for this.)

The hard answer:

To fully, and correctly, explain what is going on in the air gap and in the iron core we need to use the two separate concepts of Magnetic Flux Density "B" and Magnetic Field Strength "H". Inside and outside the core those two quantities behave in different ways. Explaining the theory needs far more space than available here. The Wikipedia article "Magnetic Field" will get you started.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top