Electromagnetic action in differential forms

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the formulation of the electromagnetic action using differential forms and its equivalence to vector calculus representations. Participants explore the mathematical expressions involved, aiming to clarify the relationships between different formulations of the electromagnetic action.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the electromagnetic action in differential forms as ##\displaystyle{S=-\frac{1}{4}\int F\wedge \star F}## and seeks to demonstrate its equivalence to the vector calculus form ##S = \int \frac{1}{2}(E^{2}+B^{2})##.
  • Another participant challenges the initial formulation, asserting that the integrand should be proportional to ##(\vec{E}^2-\vec{B}^2)## and suggests a more careful approach to defining ##F## and ##*F##.
  • A subsequent post questions the correctness of the expression for ##F## provided by the first participant, indicating potential errors in the formulation.
  • Another participant proposes that using components is simpler, providing the Lagrangian as ##\mathcal{L}=-\frac{1}{4} F_{\mu \nu} F^{\mu \nu}## and notes the relationships between the components of the Faraday tensor and the electric and magnetic fields.
  • This participant emphasizes that the decomposition of the Lagrangian should yield a form proportional to ##(\vec{E}^2-\vec{B}^2)## and mentions another invariant related to the Faraday tensor involving the dot product of the electric and magnetic fields.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the correctness of the initial formulation of the electromagnetic action and the definitions of the forms involved. Multiple competing views remain on how to properly express the action and its equivalence.

Contextual Notes

Some participants indicate that the mathematical steps and definitions are not fully resolved, and there may be missing assumptions regarding the forms and their properties in different dimensions.

spaghetti3451
Messages
1,311
Reaction score
31
The electromagnetic action can be written in the language of differential forms as

##\displaystyle{S=-\frac{1}{4}\int F\wedge \star F.}##

The electromagnetic action can also be written in the language of vector calculus as

$$S = \int \frac{1}{2}(E^{2}+B^{2})$$

How can you show the equivalence between the two formulations of the electromagnetic action?Here is my attempt:

##\displaystyle{S=-\frac{1}{4}\int F\wedge \star F}##

##\displaystyle{=-\frac{1}{4}\int \left(\sum_i E_i\,{\rm d}t\wedge{\rm d}x^i - \star\sum_i B_i\,{\rm d}t\wedge{\rm d}x^i\right)\wedge \star \left(\sum_j E_j\,{\rm d}t\wedge{\rm d}x^j - \star\sum_j B_j\,{\rm d}t\wedge{\rm d}x^j\right)}##

##\displaystyle{=-\frac{1}{4}\int \left(\sum_i E_i\,{\rm d}t\wedge{\rm d}x^i - \star\sum_i B_i\,{\rm d}t\wedge{\rm d}x^i\right)\wedge \left(\star \sum_j E_j\,{\rm d}t\wedge{\rm d}x^j - \sum_j B_j\,{\rm d}t\wedge{\rm d}x^j\right),}##

since ##\displaystyle{**=(-1)^{p(n+p)+1}}## in Lorentzian space, where ##\star## is applied on a ##p##-form and ##n## is the number of spacetime dimensions, so that, in four dimensions for the ##2##-form ##\displaystyle{dt\wedge dx^{j}}##, ##\displaystyle{**=(-1)^{p(n+p)+1}=-1}##.

What do you do next?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First of all your ##S## in (1+3)-form is wrong. The integrand should be ##\propto (\vec{E}^2-\vec{B}^2)##. Then first write down more carefully ##F## and then ##*F## and then multiply out the forms.
 
So, you mean that

##\displaystyle{F=\left(\sum_i E_i\,{\rm d}t\wedge{\rm d}x^i - \star\sum_i B_i\,{\rm d}t\wedge{\rm d}x^i\right)}##

is wrong?
 
It's much easier in components (as usual). The Lagrangian is
$$\mathcal{L}=-\frac{1}{4} F_{\mu \nu} F^{\mu \nu}.$$
Now
$$F_{0j}=E_j, \quad F_{jk}=-\epsilon_{ijk} B_i,$$
and you can easily decompose the Lagrangian in temporal and spatial components to write it in terms of the ##(1+3)##-formalism. You must get something ##\propto (\vec{E}^2-\vec{B}^2)##. The other invariant of the Faraday tensor is ##{^\dagger}F^{\mu \nu} F_{\mu \nu} \propto \vec{E} \cdot \vec{B}##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K