Electromagnetic Black hole phenomena

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of electromagnetic "black holes" that can concentrate light, as highlighted in recent articles. Participants express skepticism about the implications of this discovery, particularly regarding its potential violation of the second law of thermodynamics. There is a debate about whether the phenomenon can effectively manipulate light in a manner similar to gravitational black holes, with concerns about frequency sensitivity and the validity of the reporting. Some believe the claims may be exaggerated or sensationalized. Overall, the conversation reflects a mix of intrigue and caution regarding the scientific claims made about this phenomenon.
bassplayer142
Messages
431
Reaction score
0
Electromagnetic "Black hole" phenomena

Just read the article and you will understand the title. I'm not sure where I should put this so if you want to move it go ahead. But this shows great potential in my eyes. A brilliant discovery if made applicable.

http://blog.taragana.com/n/scientists-create-electromagnetic-black-hole-that-sucks-in-surrounding-light-196707/

http://www.dnaindia.com/scitech/rep...-hole-that-sucks-in-surrounding-light_1299290
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Interesting.
But if that thing can indeed concentrate completely diffuse light it would violate the second law of thermodynamics.
 


DrZoidberg said:
Interesting.
But if that thing can indeed concentrate completely diffuse light it would violate the second law of thermodynamics.

That's what I was thinking. The science writer is horribly obtuse, so it's difficult to sort out what what the ideal is all about.

I think the idea here is that light will take spiraling paths to where it is intended to go, as the spiraling paths of light do near an event horizon. This would be a novel idea to me.

Now I would ask, if my guess is right, "isn't it frequency sensitive so that only narrow bands will follow decending paths and the rest scattered." I think this is sensational reporting. My initial take is that this is hyperbole.
 
Last edited:


Phrak said:
That's what I was thinking. The science writer is horribly obtuse, so it's difficult to sort out what what the ideal is all about.

I think the idea here is that light will take spiraling paths to where it is intended to go, as the spiraling paths of light do near an event horizon. This would be a novel idea to me.

Now I would ask, if my guess is right, "isn't it frequency sensitive so that only narrow bands will follow decending paths and the rest scattered." I think this is sensational reporting. My initial take is that this is hyperbole.

I think that it only works for microwaves. But they say the same principle can apply to optical light.

How exactly does it violate the 2nd law?
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top