Electromagnetic Energy propagation

AI Thread Summary
Electromagnetic energy does not require a wave medium to propagate, as demonstrated by the Michelson-Morley experiment, which disproved the existence of luminiferous ether. EM radiation can travel through a vacuum in space without needing a medium, unlike sound waves that require one. Gravity can propagate in waves, affecting the curvature of light, but it does not serve as a medium for electromagnetic energy. The discussion clarifies that the notion of a medium for light propagation is outdated and unsupported by modern physics. Overall, electromagnetic waves can travel freely through space without any medium.
bejoynp
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Hi All

Is the following statement true:

Electromagnetic energy requires a wave medium to propagate. (The way free electrons in a copper conductor transfer energy in an AC circuit. Electrons can act as wave medium).

If it is true, How does EM energy travel in space. Can gravity act as a wave medium?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
EM energy travels via vacuum through space. Gravity itself is propagated in waves and light is curved because of said gravitational fields. As for EM radiation needing a medium to propagate, what you are speculating is luminiferous ether, which was thought to exist for centuries because waves had only been seen to move though some sort of medium.The thought was that if light traveled constantly at c through a light medium, then a light medium must exist throughout the universe, for light to move through all space. This view was successfully disproved by an experiment done by Michelson and Morley. The specifics and results can be found here http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/Michelson-MorleyExperiment.html.
 
Electromagnetic radiation do not need a medium to travel into.

It can be deduced from the Razor's law, that electromagnetic wave do no need a medium to travel, following the Michelson-Morley experiment.

Cheers
 
Thank you all for the clarification
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top