Electromagnetic Four-Vector for Uniformly Moving Charge

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the electromagnetic four-vector for a uniformly moving charge, highlighting that the Lienard-Wiechert formula simplifies significantly under uniform motion, where the electric potential becomes Q/R based on the charge's current position. Participants seek a respected reference to support this understanding, noting that while Jackson's "Classical Electrodynamics" is suggested, it may not explicitly cover this simplification. Griffiths' work is mentioned for using a brute force method but lacks clarity. F. Rohrlich's "Classical Charged Particles" is recommended for its comprehensive treatment of classical electrodynamics, including self-consistency issues. Franklin's "Classical Electromagnetism" is also noted for deriving the electric field for constant velocity, reinforcing the connection to the Lienard-Wiechert field.
ApplePion
Messages
189
Reaction score
0
The general formula for the electromagnetic four-vector produced by a moving charge is the Lienard Wiechert formula, which involves the retarded position of the charge. However, in the special case where the motion of the charge is a uniform velocity motion, the result becomes extremely simple, with the retarded position no longer appearing. For example, the electric potential for a uniform velocity charge located at the origin becomes simply Q/R where R is NOT the retarded position, but actually the current position.

I need to convince someone of this, and it is unlikely he can be convinced by me calculating it for him. Can anyone supply me with a specific reference from a "respected" source where the result is clear. The actual physics calculation need not be clear--I am not really trying to reason with the person as much as to show him that some respected source agrees with me.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics. Of course, the solution with the Lienard-Wiechert potentials (retarded propagator) is the same as Lorentz boosting the Coulomb field of a point charge at rest to the frame where it is moving with constant velocity.
 
Thanks Vanhees.

Your derivation is absolutely correct. There are actually two (or more) ways to derive it, with your way being the best because it is simple and intuitive. There is also a brute force way by just substituting into the Lienard Wiechert formula.

As far as I can tell, Jackson actually does not do it. Griffiths does it using the brute force method, and is not as clear as I would like it to have been.

So I am still looking for a "convincing" source.
 
Another very nice book is

F. Rohrlich, Classical Charged Particles, World Scientific

It gives a comprehensive overview of "microscopic" classical electrodynamics, including a convincing treatment of the self-consistency problem ("radiation reaction") for accelerated charges, interacting with their own electromagnetic field.
 
Franklin's 'Classical Electromagnetism' derives the E field for constant velocity in Sec. 15.3, and shows that this result is equivalent to the L-W field in Sec. 15.4.3.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top