Electromagnetic Potential Gauge Transformations

Petar Mali
Messages
283
Reaction score
0
\Delta\vec{A}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2 \vec{A}}{\partial t^2}=-\mu_0\vec{j}

\Delta\varphi-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2 \varphi}{\partial t^2}=-\frac{1}{\epsilon_0}\rho

c=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\epsilon_0\mu_{0}}}

\epsilon_0=8,85\cdot 10^{-12}\frac{F}{m}

\mu_0=4\pi 10^{-7}T

div\vec{A}+\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \varphi}{\partial t}=0

\frac{\partial A_x}{\partial x}+\frac{\partial A_y}{\partial _y}+\frac{\partial A_z}{\partial z}+\frac{\partial (\frac{1}{c}\varphi)}{\partial (ct)}=0

A^{\mu}=(\vec{A},\frac{1}{c}\varphi)

A_{\mu}=g_{\mu\nu}A^{\nu}

A_{\mu}=(-\vec{A},\frac{1}{c}\varphi)

divA^{\mu}=0

Can I say from

A^{\mu}=(\vec{A},\frac{1}{c}\varphi)

and

A_{\mu}=(-\vec{A},\frac{1}{c}\varphi)

something more about gauge transformations of electromagnetic potentials

\varphi_0=\varphi-\frac{\partial f}{\partial t}

\vec{A}_0=\vec{A}+gradf

I think about - sign in first term -\frac{\partial f}{\partial t} and + sign in second term +gradf


Or

\varphi_0=\varphi+\frac{\partial f}{\partial t}

\vec{A}_0=\vec{A}-gradf

\Delta A^{\mu}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2 A^{\mu}}{\partial t^2}=-\mu_0j^{\mu}

j^{\mu}=(j_x,j_y,j_z,c\rho)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The gauge transformation of A_\mu is

A_\mu\mapsto A_\mu +\frac{\partial f}{\partial x^\mu}

or, alternatively, which is the same replacing f by -f:

A_\mu\mapsto A_\mu -\frac{\partial f}{\partial x^\mu}

All the rest you derive from this basic formula.
 
@ arkajad

Thanks!
 
Petar Mali said:
Can I say from

A^{\mu}=(\vec{A},\frac{1}{c}\varphi)

and

A_{\mu}=(-\vec{A},\frac{1}{c}\varphi)

something more about gauge transformations of electromagnetic potentials
I thought that only the Lorentz gauge condition was Lorentz covariant. So does the four-potential in a different gauge even transform like a tensor? I would think not.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
987
Replies
1
Views
966
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top