Electromagnetic power radiation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electromagnetic power radiated by a proton in a cyclotron using Larmor's formula. The initial confusion was about determining the acceleration (a) of the proton, which was clarified to be centripetal rather than angular. The correct expression for acceleration was derived, leading to the conclusion that substituting this into the power equation yields the desired result. The importance of accurately applying the formula and understanding the physics behind it was emphasized. Overall, the thread highlights the process of solving a physics problem involving electromagnetic radiation from a charged particle.
gnome
Messages
1,031
Reaction score
1
Given that the electromagnetic power radiated by a nonrelativistic moving point charge q having acceleration a is:
P = \frac {q^2a^2}{6 \pi \epsilon_0 c^3}
(This formula was presented without discussion or explanation in the problems section of my textbook.)


If a proton is placed in a cyclotron with a radius of 0.500 m and a magnetic field of magnitude 0.350 T, what electromagnetic power is radiated by this proton?

This looks like one of those dumb problems where you just plug numbers into a formula, but ... what's a in this situation? We are not given the voltage difference between the dees of the cyclotron. So I thought maybe I can use the exit velocity of the proton of the proton given by
v = \frac {qBr}{m}

Edited:
OK. It turns out that was the right approach. Only I went off talking about angular acceleration, when I should be dealing with centripetal acceleration. So, the following lines of tex are garbage. The corrected stuff is in the next post.

a = \frac{v^2}{r} = \frac{q^2B^2r^2}{m^2r}

a^2 = \frac{q^4B^4r^2}{m^4}
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
OK.

Please just disregard that garbage up above. I've tried editing it several times, but for some reason the board won't let me fix the tex images, so the last 2 lines of tex are nonsense.

Sorry...

It should say

a = \frac{v^2}{r} = \frac{q^2B^2r^2}{m^2r}

and then:

a^2 = \frac{q^4B^4r^2}{m^4}

and then putting that into the power equation works.
 
Last edited:
Well... you saved me the trouble of decoding them!

That power equation is called Larmor's formula, by the way.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top