Electromagnetic version of the positive energy theorem?

schieghoven
Messages
84
Reaction score
1
Hello,

I've been quite avidly reading about one of the spectacular recent joint achievements of physics and pure math. The positive energy theorem [1,2,3] concerns the large-distance asymptotic behaviour of the gravitational field due to a localised distribution of mass-energy. I think I paraphrase the theorem correctly to say that, provided the source is physical (energy density T_00 is everywhere positive in every local Lorentz frame), then the energy of the system, as inferred from the large-distance gravitational field, is also positive. A neat and powerful result.

I was wondering if a similar result holds for electromagnetic theory. If we take Maxwell's equations and again impose that the source is physical (the current J_\mu is future-timelike), does this place some analogous constraint on the large-distance behaviour of the associated electromagnetic field? This linear system should presumably be much easier than the hard-core nonlinearity of Einstein GR, but nothing obvious jumped out at me.

Thanks,

Dave

* [1] Schoen, R. and Yau, S-T., Commun. Math. Phys, 65 (1979) 45
* [2] Witten, E., Commun. Math. Phys. 80 (1981) 381
* [3] Kazdan, J., Seminaire N. Bourbaki, 24 (1982) 315, Exp 593

[3], a review article, is publicly available at http://www.numdam.org/numdam-bin/browse?j=SB
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Assuming that the current density is nonzero and future-directed timelike implies that the system's charge (measured either normally or via the asymptotic fields) is non-negative. This is pretty easy to see from the first method:

<br /> q = \int_\Sigma J^a \mathrm{d}S_a &gt; 0.<br />

Using Stoke's theorem together with Maxwell's equations shows that this also appears in the field at infinity:

<br /> q = \frac{1}{8\pi} \int_{\partial \Sigma} F^{ab} \mathrm{d}S_{ab} .<br />

Unlike in the gravitational case, this kind of restriction on the source is not consistent with observations. Spacelike currents are actually very common. Think of an ordinary wire. There's no net charge, yet there is a 3-current. The 4-current is therefore spacelike. This is possible because there are both positive and negative charges.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
Back
Top