Electromagnetic Wave Prob. (Is this a typo/error?)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a potential error in the solution to an electromagnetic wave problem from a textbook. The original poster questions the accuracy of the solution, highlighting a mathematical mistake regarding the modulus being 'a'. Participants note that such errors are common in textbooks, often attributed to authors or their graduate students. The conversation emphasizes the prevalence of typos in academic materials. Overall, the thread reflects on the reliability of textbook solutions in the context of electromagnetic theory.
WolfOfTheSteps
Messages
134
Reaction score
0
Electromagnetic Wave Prob. (Is this a typo/error??)

http://img519.imageshack.us/img519/4536/errorko2.th.jpg

This is the book's solution to an E&M problem. I typed in the part that is enclosed by a red box.

Am I not correct, and the "official" solution is wrong?!?

It's basically a math error, but I can't believe they made it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, the modulus is clearly 'a'. Who is 'they'?
 
Dick said:
Yes, the modulus is clearly 'a'. Who is 'they'?

The book's author! :eek: (I should have said "he")
 
Last edited:
Wolf of the Ste said:
The book's author! :eek: (I should have said "he")

It's not necessarily the books author that writes the solutions-- it was probably one of his grad students! Anyway, books have loads of typos in; it's nothing new!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top