Electromagnetic waves and charge

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the interaction of light, as an electromagnetic wave, with charged particles. Participants explore why charges do not seem to experience significant forces from the electric and magnetic components of electromagnetic waves, particularly in practical scenarios like sunlight exposure on charged objects.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that charges do experience forces from light waves, referencing phenomena like Thompson scattering and Compton scattering to explain charge response to electromagnetic fields.
  • Others question the practical implications, noting that a charged disk in sunlight does not visibly move, suggesting that the forces involved are very small.
  • One participant explains that while the electric field is perpendicular to the direction of light propagation, it can cause electrons and ions in a charged disk to move in opposite directions, resulting in no net movement of the disk.
  • Another participant describes a scenario with a light disk that can rotate when exposed to light, attributing this to the momentum transfer from photons reflecting off a mirror surface and being absorbed by a black surface.
  • Some participants engage in a discussion about the Crookes radiometer, with differing interpretations of its operation, including debates on whether it functions as a heat engine or through momentum transfer from light.
  • There is a suggestion that the electric field of light interacts with charged particles, causing vibrations that lead to radiation or heating effects, but the underlying reasons for observed phenomena remain uncertain.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the effectiveness of light in exerting forces on charges, with some agreeing that charges can feel forces from light while others emphasize the practical limitations and conditions under which these forces manifest. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the extent and implications of these interactions.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in understanding the forces at play, including the small magnitude of forces involved and the dependence on specific conditions such as the nature of the charged object and the properties of light. The discussion also touches on the complexities of interpreting experimental results and theoretical models.

arvindsharma
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Dear All,

Can anyone explain me if light is an electromagnetic wave then why a charge does not experiences an electric force(or magnetic force) due to electric field component(or magnetic field component)of electromagnetic wave? this is a very challenging question asked by my friend to me.


Regards

Arvind
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you mean? Charges do experience a force from the light wave.
 
arvindsharma said:
Dear All,

Can anyone explain me if light is an electromagnetic wave then why a charge does not experiences an electric force(or magnetic force) due to electric field component(or magnetic field component)of electromagnetic wave? this is a very challenging question asked by my friend to me.


Regards

Arvind

Classically, see Thompson scattering to understand how a charge responds to the oscillating electric and magnetic fields of a light wave. A relativistically correct treatment of the charge's motion yield Compton scattering.
 
it means if i keep a disc of charge in sunlight then it will experience a force due to electric field component and hence it should move but practically this does not happen.why?
 
because the force due to electric field is very very smallD
 
The electric field is perpendicular to the ray, the direction of propagation of the light wave. When the light shines perpendicularly to the disk, it will move the electrons and ions in it parallel to the disk, but in opposite directions. The disk will not move.

If you have a very light disk, able to rotate around a fixed axis, and make half the disk like a mirror, and black the other half, it will rotate when exposed to light. The photons colliding with the mirror part are reflected, and their momentum change from p to -p, they transfer 2p momentum to that half of the disk. The photons falling to the black part are absorbed, and they give momentum p to the black part. Change of momentum means force acting for some short time, and it provides torque. The disk will rotate.
See also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crookes_radiometer
Radiometer_9965_Nevit.gif


ehild
 
ehild said:
The electric field is perpendicular to the ray, the direction of propagation of the light wave. When the light shines perpendicularly to the disk, it will move the electrons and ions in it parallel to the disk, but in opposite directions. The disk will not move.

If you have a very light disk, able to rotate around a fixed axis, and make half the disk like a mirror, and black the other half, it will rotate when exposed to light. The photons colliding with the mirror part are reflected, and their momentum change from p to -p, they transfer 2p momentum to that half of the disk. The photons falling to the black part are absorbed, and they give momentum p to the black part. Change of momentum means force acting for some short time, and it provides torque. The disk will rotate.
See also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crookes_radiometer
Radiometer_9965_Nevit.gif


ehild

If you read the link you provided, you will notice that your explanation is not the correct one. The modern interpretation is that the Crookes radiometer is simply a heat engine.

ETA: But of course, to be relevant to the OP, charges can feel a force from light.
 
Anyway, light interacts with sheets of the mill, and reflected from the silver part, absorbed by the other. Both reflection and absorption occurs as the electric field of light interacts with the charged particles, force them to vibrate, and producing electric field which radiates back or heats up the black surface. What is the real reason of rotation is an other question.

ehild
 
ehild said:
Anyway, light interacts with sheets of the mill, and reflected from the silver part, absorbed by the other. Both reflection and absorption occurs as the electric field of light interacts with the charged particles, force them to vibrate, and producing electric field which radiates back or heats up the black surface. What is the real reason of rotation is an other question.

ehild

Totally. The fact that you and I can see to read this post tells us all we need to know about light interacting with charge.
 
  • #10
e.bar.goum said:
If you read the link you provided, you will notice that your explanation is not the correct one. The modern interpretation is that the Crookes radiometer is simply a heat engine.

ETA: But of course, to be relevant to the OP, charges can feel a force from light.

To expand . . . . The Crooke's Radiometer you can buy works because there is a temperature difference between the black and white sides. The black has absorbed more energy. The vacuum is not very good so there are a significant number of collisions with air molecules. The ones hitting the hot side will leave with more momentum than the ones hitting the cold side. So the vane is pushed the 'wrong' way round (away from the black side) - different from one in a good vacuum, where the momentum change is maximum on the white side, causing it to turn away from the white side. I have never seen a 'proper' radiometer.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
22K